Suppose that $f=f(x,y)$ is $C^1$ in $x$ and $y$, where $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$ and $f(x_0,y_0)=0$. Moreover, $\frac{\partial f(x,y)}{\partial y}>0$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$. Could we conclude that $y$ can be solved implicitly from $f(x,y)=0$ in terms of $x$ as $y=y(x)$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$? If the answer is no and an additional assumption is imposed, i.e. we can obtain $y'(x)>0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$ by implicitly differentiating $f(x,y(x))=0$ with respect to $x$, then these assumptions are enough to get the same conclusion?
2026-03-28 07:49:47.1774684187
Local implicit function theorem and Global implicit function theorem
2.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IMPLICIT-FUNCTION-THEOREM
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Is the Inverse Function Theorem Global?
- $X^2 + X =A$ with $X, A\in \text{Mat}_{2,2} (\mathbb{R})$ . Show that there exists a solution $X$ for a given $A$
- How to see the sign of an entangled PDE
- Help me understand this proof of Implicit Function Theorem on Banach spaces
- Implicit function theorem involving $\cos$ function
- Does this entangled PDE capture the derivative?
- Applying implicit function theorem
- Question involving implicit functions and PDE
- What to do when we can't apply the implicit function theorem?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I'm not sure what you want to know beyond what is shown in this question and it's answer, but that question shows already where you have to expect the result to break down. As an example, consider
$$F(x,y) = - e^{-y} +x$$ Clearly, $\frac{\partial F}{\partial y} = e^{-y}>0$ everywhere, but it is easy to see that $F$ is strictly negative for $x\le0$ on the one hand side but admits a (obviously unique) solution of $F(x,y) = 0$ for each $x>0$. This shows that if the bounds on the derivates no longer hold, the solution may go off to infinity (Which is exactly what happens in this example).