Is there any operator ♤ such that the above operation is true for any numbers a, b, and a+b such that they make good logarithmands (their logs are defined)? I am guessing that if ♤ exists, then it is unique (at lest for such values); can you give a proof/counterexample of this assertion? What is this operator ♤ in terms of the more common arithmetic operators; can you describe this new operator to me? (I guess that we could describe it in terms of Taylor series.) Is ♤ actually useful for anything? Last, can we repeat this process where we find an operator ♧ that splits a logarithm of a quantity given by ♤?
2026-05-16 15:15:29.1778944529
$\log{(a+b)} = \log{(a)} ♤ \log{(b)} $
218 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGARITHMS
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Extracting the S from formula
- How to prove the following inequality (log)
- Rewriting $(\log_{11}5)/(\log_{11} 15)$
- How to solve this equation with $x$ to a logarithmic power?
- Show that $\frac{1}{k}-\ln\left(\frac{k+1}{k}\right)$ is bounded by $\frac{1}{k^2}$
- Why do we add 1 to logarithms to get number of digits?
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Unusual Logarithm Problem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$$x♤y=\log(e^x+e^y)$$ has this property. It's the only such operator.
If you mean "does it have a name," no, it doesn't. Unless you want to call it the pullback of $+$ on $\mathbb R^+$ through the function $e^x:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^+$. It is almost certainly useless, but who knows?
Proving it is unique is pretty easy. Let $a=e^x$ and $b=e^y$. Then if $♤$ has this property, then $$\log(e^x+e^y)=\log(a+b)=\log (a)♤\log(b)=x♤y$$
In general, if $\star$ is a binary operator on $\mathbb R^+$ we can define a binary $♧$ on $\mathbb R$ as:
$$x ♧y=\log(e^x\star e^y)$$
The key question is, is $♤$ an operation on $\mathbb R^+$? That is to say, if $x,y\in\mathbb R^+$ then is $x♤y\in\mathbb R^+$? I'll leave that to you to answer.