Please correct my reasoning:
There is a 5 out of 36 lottery (5 unique numbers out of pool of 36 numbers ranging [1,2,…,36]).
Strategy 1: just play any random combination. Like 12345, or better 11111. Chances of such combination to appear are so low that I need to live thousands of years for it to appear. Maybe in my lifetime, but probably not.
Strategy 2: I know that 198492 (5-number) combinations out of all 376992 (that is 53% !) have some property (say arithmetic mean in range x..y). So I would 100% hit into that group many times in my lifetime! It is better to try to hit something that appears often, rather than some rarely-appearing ghost?
The probability that the winning combination has this property is $53\%$, but you don't get to choose all the combinations from this selection of combinations when you buy your ticket, you only get to choose one. The probability of any individual 5 digit combination is equal - you still have to find a way of choosing one of the combinations with this property. You are not accounting for this, so this is where your reasoning fails.
With strategy $1$, the combination $1,2,3,4,5$ is just as likely as something like $3,11,19,22,34$, but the fact that all the numbers in this second combination seem to follow no pattern is probably why it intuitively may seem more likely to occur. That is because the probability that a "random-looking" combination will win is much greater than the probability that the winning numbers will be consecutive. This is true. But which random-looking combination will win? That's just luck.