In page 70 of the book Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers by J. Barkley Rosser and Lowell Schoenfeld, it is given that \begin{equation} \log\log x < \sum_{p\leq x}\frac{1}{p}\quad \text{for}\, x>1 \end{equation} How can one prove it? Is there an elementary proof of this? No proof has been mentioned in the book.
2026-04-29 22:16:06.1777500966
Lower bound for sum of reciprocal of primes
380 Views Asked by user834302 https://math.techqa.club/user/user834302/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SUMMATION
- Computing:$\sum_{n=0}^\infty\frac{3^n}{n!(n+3)}$
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- Sigma (sum) Problem
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Double-exponential sum (maybe it telescopes?)
- Simplify $\prod_{k=1}^{l} \sum_{r=d}^m {{m}\choose{r}} \left(N-k \right)^{r} k^{m-r+1}$
- Sum of two martingales
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Interesting inequalities
Related Questions in PRIME-NUMBERS
- New prime number
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- I'm having a problem interpreting and starting this problem with primes.
- Decimal expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$: what is its period?
- Multiplying prime numbers
- Find the number of relatively prime numbers from $10$ to $100$
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Squares of two coprime numbers
Related Questions in ANALYTIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- question regarding nth prime related to Bertrands postulate.
- Alternating sequence of ascending power of 2
- Reference for proof of Landau's prime ideal theorem (English)
- Does converge $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{1}{\varphi(p_n-2)-1+p_n}$, where $\varphi(n)$ is the Euler's totient function and $p_n$ the $n$th prime number?
- On the behaviour of $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{\pi(\varphi(k)+N)}{\varphi(\pi(k)+N)}$ as $N\to\infty$
- Analytic function to find k-almost primes from prime factorization
- Easy way to prove that the number of primes up to $n$ is $\Omega(n^{\epsilon})$
- Eisenstein Series, discriminant and cusp forms
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We can argue as follows. A truncation of the Euler product gives
$$\prod_{p \le x} \left( \frac{1}{1 - \frac{1}{p}} \right) > \sum_{n=1}^x \frac{1}{n} = H_x > \log x$$
(since the LHS is exactly the sum of $\frac{1}{n}$ over all $n$ whose prime factors are $\le x$). Taking logs gives
$$\sum_{p \le x} - \log \left( 1 - \frac{1}{p} \right) > \log H_x > \log \log x$$
(all logs are natural). Taylor's theorem with remainder on the interval $[0, \frac 1 2]$ gives that if $0 \le x \le \frac 1 2$ then
$$\frac{x^2}{4} \le \log (1 - x) + x \le x^2$$
so $\log (1 - x) \le -x + x^2$ (we only need this half of the bound) on $[0, \frac 1 2]$ which gives
$$\sum_{p \le x} \left( \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p^2} \right) \ge \sum_{p \le x} - \log \left( 1 - \frac{1}{p} \right) > \log \log x.$$
Since $\sum_{p \le x} \frac{1}{p^2} < \sum_p \frac{1}{p^2} < \sum_n \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}$ this gives
$$\sum_{p \le x} \frac{1}{p} > \log \log x - \frac{\pi^2}{6}$$
which is not quite as good as what you asked for but pretty good; this argument requires no particularly hard tools. A slightly better version of this bound is given on Wikipedia but it doesn't get the constant all the way down to zero. There are several places in this argument where the bounds can be tightened up.