Suppose I want to approximate the indicator function $f:= \chi_{[0,1]}$ on $\mathbb{R}$ with mollifications (choose the standard mollifier $\phi$). Then we know that with respect to $L^2$ we have $\phi_\epsilon * f \to f$ as $\epsilon\to 0$. What should happen for the derivatives $\phi'_\epsilon * f$ is that they do not converge $L^2$ (the closer we get, the steeper the slope should get at say $x=0$). However I am having difficulties proving this with an explicit lower bound on $\lvert\lvert\phi'_\epsilon * f\rvert\rvert_2$, that explodes as $\epsilon\to 0$. Since we get a factor of $1/\epsilon$ from $\phi'_\epsilon$, i suppose this is the divergence rate but I do not have a precise argument for that. Can someone help out with a reference here? I am sure this was done before.
2026-04-12 04:44:45.1775969085
Lower bound on $L^2$-norm of derivative
208 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Related Questions in CONVOLUTION
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- Convolution sum
- PDF of the sum of two random variables integrates to >1
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof of Young's inequality $\Vert u \star v \Vert_p \le \Vert u \Vert_1 \Vert v \Vert_p.$
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- Computing the convolution of $f(x)=\gamma1_{(\alpha,\alpha+\beta)}(x)$
- Convolution of distributions property
- Self-convolution of $f(\vec{r}) = e^{-x^2-y^2}/r^2$
- Inverse $z$-transform similar to convolution
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Heuristically speaking, the derivative of $f$ is a sum of Dirac deltas, the regularization of which stays bounded in $L^1$ and grows like $\epsilon^{-1}$ in $L^\infty$. Thus, by Hölder’s inequality, you expect the $L^2$ norm of $\phi_\epsilon’ *f$ to grow like $1/\sqrt \epsilon$.
Explicitly, assume that $\phi_1$ has has support in $[-1,1]$. Then by algebraic manipulations it holds $$ [\phi_\epsilon’ *f](x)= \phi_\epsilon(x)-\phi_\epsilon(x-1),$$ where the two addends on the right-hand side have disjoint supports assuming $\epsilon<1$. This means that $$ || \phi_\epsilon’ *f||_{L^2}^2=|| \phi_\epsilon||_{L^2}^2+|| \phi_\epsilon(\cdot-1)||_{L^2}^2=2|| \phi_\epsilon||_{L^2}^2. $$ Then one has to compute the quantity on the right hand side: $$ || \phi_\epsilon||_{L^2}^2=\int_\mathbb R|\epsilon^{-1}\phi(\epsilon^{-1}t)|^2dt= \epsilon^{-1}\int_\mathbb R|\phi(s)|^2ds\sim \epsilon^{-1}, $$ so that the $L^2$ norm of $\phi_\epsilon’ *f$ grows like $1/\sqrt \epsilon$.
Edit. If you remember my answer to this question, you can also think of this on the Fourier side and have very precise information: the Fourier transform of $f$ is bounded by $1/|\xi|$, so that the Fourier transform of $\frac{d}{dx}f$ is bounded. By Plancherel’s theorem, $||f_\epsilon’||_{L^2}=|||\xi|\widehat {f_\epsilon}||_{L^2}=|||\xi|\widehat f ( \cdot)\widehat \phi(\epsilon\cdot) ||_{L^2}\leq|||\xi|\widehat f||_{L^\infty}||\widehat\phi(\epsilon\cdot)||_{L^2},$ and you can compute the latter norm explicitly.