While watching this Numberphile video on Mandelbrot sets, it's more or less stated that the fractal will "blow up" if it's radius of convergence is greater than 2. What is the mathematical basis for this? I'm currently a master's student in math so I'd like a rigourous reason for this if possible.
2026-03-25 12:53:07.1774443187
Mandelbrot sets and radius of convergence
7.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-NUMBERS
- Value of an expression involving summation of a series of complex number
- Minimum value of a complex expression involving cube root of a unity
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- Locus corresponding to sum of two arguments in Argand diagram?
- Logarithmic function for complex numbers
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- relation between arguments of two complex numbers
- Equality of two complex numbers with respect to argument
- Trouble computing $\int_0^\pi e^{ix} dx$
- Roots of a complex equation
Related Questions in FRACTALS
- does the area converge?
- "Mandelbrot sets" for different polynomials
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- Does the boundary of the Mandelbrot set $M$ have empty interior?
- What sort of function is this? (Logistic map?)
- effective degree for normalized escape-time of hybrids
- Julia set of $x_n = \frac{ x_{n-1}^2 - 1}{n}$
- A closed form for the sum $\sum_{s=0}^{n-1} e^{\frac{s(s+1)}{2}i\theta}$?
- Given a real number $d , (1<d<2)$, is there a fractal with fractal dimension $d$?
- How can one write a line element for non-integer dimensions?
Related Questions in CHAOS-THEORY
- Chaotic behaviour from iteration process.
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Homeomorphism between Smale set and $\{0,2\} ^{\mathbb{Z}}$
- Making something a control parameter or a variable when analysing a dynamical system
- Lorenz attractor as a position-velocity-acceleration problem
- Do chaos and/or limit cycles always require the existence of an unstable fixed point?
- Is the "sensitive dependence on initial conditions" of chaotic systems referring to the seed, control parameters, or both?
- Logistic map and chaos on a Cantor set
- Moser invariant curves in discrete dynamical systems and how they give stability
- Why do we need folding and a finite domain for chaos?
Related Questions in COMPLEX-DYNAMICS
- Is the Mandelbrot set path-connected?
- effective degree for normalized escape-time of hybrids
- Julia set of $x_n = \frac{ x_{n-1}^2 - 1}{n}$
- Is this proof of Milnor's lemma valid? the one about Newtons method and super-attractive fixed-points corresponding to simple roots
- Hausdorff Dimension of Julia set of $z^2+2$?
- How to find the set of $c$ for which the Julia set of $x^2+c$ completely lies in $\mathbb{R}$?
- Iteration of mapping with nested iterates in logarithm
- Help understanding a proof on why the Mandelbrot set is fractal
- bounds on dimension of Julia sets inside Mandelbrot set
- How does this algorithm get the limit set of "kissing" Schottky group?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
That's an inaccurate description of what was said. Indeed, we consider iteration of the function $f(z)=z^2+c$, starting from $0$, where $c$ is a fixed complex number. That is, $z_0=0$ and after that $z_{n+1}=f(z_n) = f^{n+1}(z_0)$.
But the Mandelbrot set does not consist of the numbers $z_n$. It consists of the numbers $c$ such that the sequence $z_n$ is bounded. So, if $z_n\to \infty$, this only means that the number $c$ we used for this sequence is not in the Mandelbrot set.
The claim is that if $|z_n|>2$ for some $n$, then the sequence $z_n$ tends to infinity ("blows up" or "escapes to infinity"), and consequently $c$ is not in the set. Instead of calling $2$ the "radius of convergence", I would call it "radius of escape".
The proof consists of two cases.
Case 1: $|c|\le 2$. Then $|z_{n+1}|\ge |z_n|^2 - |c| > 2|z_n|-2$. Rewriting this as $$|z_{n+1}|-2 > 2(|z_n|-2)$$ we see that $|z_n|-2$ tends to infinity.
Case 2. $|c|>2$. What helps here is that $|z_1|=|c^2+c|\ge |c|^2-|c|>|c|$. For subsequent iterations, $$|z_{n+1}|\ge |z_n|^2 - |c| \ge |c||z_n|-|c| \ge |z_n|+(|c|-1)|z_n|-|c|> |z_n|+(|c|-1)|c|-|c|$$ Here $(|c|-1)|c|-|c|$ is a positive constant. By induction, the inequality $|z_n|>|c|$ continues to hold, and the differences $|z_{n+1}|-|z_n|$ are bounded from below by a positive constant. Hence, $|z_n|\to \infty$.
The answer benefited from this post by Mike Hurley.