I am reading about triangulated categories. According to the axioms, given a morphism $f : A \to B$, there is a so-called mapping cone $C$ of $f$, i.e., an object $C$ with maps $g: B \to C$ and $h: C \to A[1]$ such that $A \to B \to C \to A[1]$ is a distinguished triangle. $C$ is not unique, but on Wikipedia it is claimed that any two mapping cones $C$ and $C'$ for $f$ are isomorphic. Now, I can see that by the axioms there must be morphisms $j:C \to C'$ and $k:C' \to C$ such that $(k \circ j) \circ g = g$ and other similar equalities, but I can really not deduce that $k \circ j=\mathrm{id}_C$. Any hints?
2026-04-22 06:40:46.1776840046
Mapping cone is unique up to (non-unique) isomorphism
401 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in TRIANGULATED-CATEGORIES
- Why are cones of left $\mathcal{X}$-approximations right $\mathcal{X}$-approximations?
- Mapping cone and additive functors
- Shift in a stable $\infty$-category
- Map having a cokernel in a triangulated category
- Proving the direct sum of two distinguished triangles is a distinguished triangle
- Examples of Triangulated Categories that aren't quotient categories
- Compact generators in a triangulated category and how they relate to general generators
- How to prove this is a triangulated subcategory?
- Question about a proof of mapping cones and the octohedral axiom for a triangulated category
- Why is a direct summand of a pretriangle a pretriangle?
Related Questions in ADDITIVE-CATEGORIES
- Is the kernel of projections in an additive category preserved by additive functors?
- Mapping cone and additive functors
- Additive Yoneda Lemma
- In an additive category, why a morphism between complexes can be factored as a composition of a homotopy equivalence and a monomorphism?
- Proving the direct sum of two distinguished triangles is a distinguished triangle
- Interpretation of preadditive categories as rings.
- Submodules in a preadditive category with one object.
- Identity making each $\operatorname{Hom}_\mathcal{A}(A,B)$ an abelian group in an additive category the Zero map?
- axioms of additive categories
- How to think about the octohedral axiom for triangulated categories?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The point is that $Hom(X,.)$ sends a distinguished triangle to a long exact sequence.
Now consider a morphism of triangles $$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} A@>>> B@>>> C@>>>A[1]\\ @VVV@VVV@VVV@VVV\\ A'@>>>B'@>>> C'@>>> A'[1] \end{CD} $$ such that two out of the three maps are isomorphisms, say $A\to A'$ and $B\to B'$. We want to show that $C\to C'$ is also an isomorphism.
For any $X$, apply the functor $Hom(X,.)$. You get two long exact sequences and a morphism between them such $Hom(X,A[n])\to Hom(X,A'[n])$ and $Hom(X,B[n])\to Hom(X,B'[n])$ are isomorphisms. From the 5-lemma you have that for any $X$, the map $Hom(X,C)\to Hom(X, C')$ is an isomorphism. By naturality, you can deduce that $Hom(.,C)\to Hom(.,C')$ is a natural isomorphism. Then from Yoneda's lemma, $C\to C'$ is an isomorphism.
The unicity of mapping cone follows from this.