I was wondering if there is any work towards a system of mathematics were truth values could take on 3 values. Traditionally, we view every statement as either true or false. Computers are built in binary but in theory there could be a ternary computer https://hackaday.com/2016/12/16/building-the-first-ternary-microprocessor/. Could we do something similar in mathematics and what would it look like? Also, is there anyone working towards this? Thanks in advance!
2026-03-25 12:47:19.1774442839
Math With Base 3 Truth Values
104 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in PROPOSITIONAL-CALCULUS
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Can we use the principle of Explosion to justify the definition of implication being True when the antecedent is False?
- Simplify $(P \wedge Q \wedge R)\vee(\neg P\wedge Q\wedge\neg R)\vee(\neg P\wedge\neg Q\wedge R)\vee(\neg P \wedge\neg Q\wedge\neg R)$
- Alternative theories regarding the differences between the material conditional and the indicative conditionals used in natural language?
- Translations into logical notation
- Is the negation of $(a\wedge\neg b) \to c = a \wedge\neg b \wedge\neg c$?
- I am kind of lost in what do I do from here in Propositional Logic Identities. Please help
- Boolean Functional completeness of 5 operator set in propositional logic
- Variables, Quantifiers, and Logic
- Comparison Propositional Logic
Related Questions in ALTERNATIVE-SET-THEORIES
- Set theory without infinite sets
- Question regarding Paraconistent valued models
- Is the second completeness axiom for V really needed for Ackermann set theory to interpret ZF?
- Asking for refs: formalisms that admit {x}={{x}}
- Subtyping of Prop in Coq. Implementation of Ackermann class theory. First-order theories.
- Ackermann set theory appears to prove inaccessible cardinals exist?
- Soft question - recommendations concerning basic topics inside rough set theory
- Principia Mathematica, chapter *117: a false proposition?
- How badly does foundation fail in NF(etc.)?
- Relative consistency of ZF with respect to IZF
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Sure, this can be and has been done.
A third truth value $u$ may be thought of in different ways: as ”neither true nor false“ (a truth value gap) or as ”both true and false“ (a truth value glut), or possibly something different altogether.
Two common examples of three-valued logics which assume a third truth value $u$ include strong Kleene 3-valued logic $K_3$, and $LP$ .
Both of these logics define the following truth tables for the standard connectives:
Note that the particular semantics defined here is a conservative extension of classical logic: Classical input values yield classical output values.
The interpretation of $u$ is where $K3$ and $LP$ differ: $K_3$ treats $u$ as a truth value gap; $LP$ treats $u$ as a truth value glut. Although the semantics of the object language connectives are the same between the two logics, the different interpretations associated with the truth value $u$ give rise to a different meta logic, resulting in some logical inferences being valid in $K_3$ but not in $LP$ or vice versa. For instance, $\nvDash_{K_3} p ∧ ¬p → q$, and $p → q, p \nvDash_{LP} q$ (that is, $LP$ rejects modus ponens!).
A reasonable alternative to the above semantics is to change the truth tables for $\to$ and $\leftrightarrow$ such that in the interpretation where $φ$ and $ψ$ are both $u$ (middle cell), the implication and the biimplication is $1$ rather than $u$. This modification is known as Lukasiewicz logic, $L_3$.
And of course, there are a number of other possible three-valued logics with different truth tables and logical laws.
If you would like to read up more, I recommend
This is a rather accessibly written overview of non-standard logics that includes a chapter on many-valued logics.