Let G group. Recently i read that $\mathbb{Z}$ can be considered as $\mathbb{Z}G$- module with the trivial action, such that : $$\forall x\in \mathbb{Z}G,\ z\in \mathbb{Z}:\quad x\cdot z:=z$$ But if that is true then for every $x,x'\in \mathbb{Z}G$ and $z\in \mathbb{Z}$ we have that $$(x+x')\cdot z=x\cdot z+x'\cdot z\Rightarrow z=z+z.$$ Where is the problem about the definition of this action ?
2026-03-26 19:15:47.1774552547
$\mathbb{Z}$ as $\mathbb{Z}G$ - module.
58 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in GROUP-ACTIONS
- Orbit counting lemma hexagon
- Showing a group G acts on itself by right multiplication
- $N\trianglelefteq G$, $A$ a conjugacy class in $G$ such that $A\subseteq N$, prove $A$ is a union of conjugacy classes
- Show that the additive group $\mathbb{Z}$ acts on itself by $xy = x+y$ and find all $x\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $xy = y$ for all $y\in\mathbb{Z}$.
- Number of different k-coloring of an $n\times m$ grid up to rows and columns permutations
- How to embed $F_q^\times $ in $S_n$?
- orbit representatives for the group of unipotent matrix acting on the set of skew-symmetric matrices
- $S_n$ right-action on $V^{\otimes n}$
- Interpretation of wreath products in general and on symmetric groups
- Regarding action of a group factoring through
Related Questions in GROUP-RINGS
- Why does the product in a group ring have finite support?
- What breaks if I use a $G$-module instead of a $\mathbb{K}[G]$-module: Induced reps, Frobenius reciprocity?
- About the matrix representation of group algebra
- Group algebra functor preserves colimits
- Group ring confusion
- The isomorphic between rings
- $\mathbb{Z}_p[\mathbb{Z}/p^{n}\mathbb{Z}]\cong \mathbb{Z}_p[T]/\left((T+1)^{p^n}-1\right)$ as topological rings?
- Homology of group rings
- Decomposition of $\mathbb{C}[G]$ / Orthogonality relations
- Center of Group algebra finitely generated
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The correct definition is to define $g\cdot x =x$ for all $g \in G$ and $x \in \mathbb{Z}$. Then, for an arbitrary element of $\mathbb{Z}G$, we let it act by the obvious linear extension. So, given $w=\sum_{g\in G} a_gg$ with $a_g \in \mathbb{Z}$ we would define $$ w\cdot x = \left( \sum_{g\in G} a_gg\right) \cdot x = \sum_{g \in G} a_g (g\cdot x) = \sum_{g \in G} a_gx. $$ So, in your case, for two group elements $g_1, g_2$ you would have $$ (g_1+g_2) \cdot x = g_1 \cdot x + g_2 \cdot x = x+x. $$ This is not $x$ because $g_1+g_2$ is not an element of $G$, but a linear combination in $\mathbb{Z}G$.
This is exactly analogous to defining a linear map on vector space $V$ by defining it solely on a basis and then just saying "we extend it to all of $V$ by linearity." Here, $G$ is the "basis" of $\mathbb{Z}G$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ is the "scalars."