I'm reading a paper and they say "it's convenient to employ a matrix representation for the gradient of f ". Then they simply give the matrix form, but obviously I'm a bit lost. Here are the equations shown in the paper
$ f:(x,t) \mapsto (z,t)=f(x,t) $
$ \frac{\partial f}{\partial(x,t)} = \begin{bmatrix}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}&\frac{\partial z}{\partial t}\\0^T&1\end{bmatrix}$
I don't know if showing the math helps, but what do they mean by "matrix representation of the gradient"? The bottom row of the matrix they've shown has me confused.
The gradient of $f = (f_1,f_2)$ is given by $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial(x,t)} =\pmatrix{\frac{\partial f_1}{\partial x}&\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial x}\\ \frac{\partial f_1}{\partial t}&\frac{\partial f_2}{\partial t}}.$$ Using $f_1 = z$ and $f_2 = t$, you get the result.