Does anyone know how to prove that every Euclidean space is countably metacompact? In particular, my interest is in $R^2$. Thanks,
2026-04-25 01:28:49.1777080529
Metacompactness of the Euclidean space
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in COMPACTNESS
- Every nonempty perfect set in $\mathbb R^k$ is uncountable: Rudin's argument
- Help in understanding proof of Heine-Borel Theorem from Simmons
- Is the distance between those compact sets equal to $0$?
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Set of Positive Sequences that Sum to 1 is Compact under Product Topology?
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Never Used Compact Closure...
- Continuity of the maximal element of a multi-valued function
- Consider the metric space of infinite sequences of 0s and 1s under this metric.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Every metric space is paracompact, hence metacompact, hence countably metacompact. Thus, $\Bbb R^n$ is countably metacompact for every $n$.
Added: A direct proof is easy if you know the following classic characterization of countable metacompactness due to Ishikawa: a space $X$ is countably metacompact iff whenever $\mathscr{F}=\{F_k:k\in\Bbb N\}$ is a family of closed sets in $X$ such that $\bigcap\mathscr{F}=\varnothing$ and $F_k\supseteq F_{k+1}$ for each $k\in\Bbb N$, then there is a family $\mathscr{U}=\{U_k:k\in\Bbb N\}$ such that $\bigcap\mathscr{U}=\varnothing$ and $U_k\supseteq F_k$ for each $k\in\Bbb N$. If $\langle X,d\rangle$ is a metric space, and $\mathscr{F}=\{F_k:k\in\Bbb N\}$ is a family of closed sets in $X$ such that $\bigcap\mathscr{F}=\varnothing$ and $F_k\supseteq F_{k+1}$ for each $k\in\Bbb N$, let
$$U_k=\bigcup_{x\in F_k}B(x,2^{-k})\;,$$
where $B(x,r)$ is the open $d$-ball of radius $r$ centred at $x$; clearly $U_k\supseteq F_k$. Let $\mathscr{U}=\{U_k:k\in\Bbb N\}$, and suppose that $x\in\bigcap\mathscr{U}$; then for each $k\in\Bbb N$ there is an $x_k\in F_k$ such that $B(x,x_k)<2^{-k}$. Clearly $\langle x_k:k\in\Bbb N\rangle\to x$. For each $n\in\Bbb N$ we have $\{x_k:k\ge n\}\subseteq F_n$, and $F_n$ is closed, so $x\in F_n$ for each $n\in\Bbb N$, and hence $x\in\bigcap_{n\in\Bbb N}F_n=\varnothing$, which is absurd. Thus, $\bigcap\mathscr{U}=\varnothing$, and $X$ is countably metacompact. $\dashv$