I saw here (A surjective map which is not a submersion) that a smooth differentiable map $f:M\to N$ between two manifolds $M$ and $N$ is not necessarily a submersion. A counterexample is $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$, $x\to x^3$, then at $x=0$ its differential is not surjective. Is it possible to make general extra assumptions on the map $f$ such that it is a submersion, and if so, what are they?
2026-04-28 21:45:53.1777412753
Minimal requirements to be a submersion.
582 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-TOPOLOGY
- Getting a self-homeomorphism of the cylinder from a self-homeomorphism of the circle
- what is Sierpiński topology?
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- The regularity of intersection of a minimal surface and a surface of positive mean curvature?
- What's the regularity of the level set of a ''semi-nondegenerate" smooth function on closed manifold?
- Help me to prove related path component and open ball
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- Prove that the sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$ which are both open and closed are $\emptyset$ and $\mathbb{R}^n$
Related Questions in SMOOTH-MANIFOLDS
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- An elementary proof that low rank maps cannot be open
- What does it mean by standard coordinates on $R^n$
- Partial Differential Equation using theory of manifolds
- Showing that a diffeomorphism preserves the boundary
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $f$ is a surjective map of constant rank, then it is a submersion. Let's prove this. The main engine is the rank theorem.
The proof I know uses contradiction, but I would like to see a different proof if anyone knows one. Anyway, here goes the one I know. Suppose $F: M \to N$ as above, and is surjective, and it is has constant rank $r < n$.
Then, given a point $p \in M$, we can put coordinate charts $U$ and $V$ around $p$ and $F(p)$ , respectively, such that we have the form $(x_1,..., x_n) \to (x_1, ..., x_r, 0,..,0)$. AS a manifold, $M$ has a basis of pre compact coordinate balls. So, we can assume $U$ is some pre compact coordinate ball, since it certainly contains such a ball containing $p$. We can also assume that $F(\overline{U}) \subseteq V$. Now, $F(\overline{U})$ is identified with a subset of $\{(y_1,...,y_r,0,...,0)| y_1,...,y_r \in \mathbb{R} \}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and so $F(\overline{U})$ clearly contains no open subset. If it did, then the image of this set in $\mathbb{R}^n$ would have to be open, and so could not be a subset of that set of points. Thus, $F(\overline{U})$ is closed, as the image of a compact set, and has empty interior, since it contains no open set. Thus, is nowhere dense.
$M$ has a countable basis of such coordinate balls, and so we can obtain a countable cover of $M$, $\{ \overline{U_{a_n}} \}$ with $F(\overline{U_{a_n}})$ nowhere dense.
So, then $M = \bigcup \overline{U_{a_n}}$ gives $F(M) = F(\bigcup \overline{U_{a_n}}) = \bigcup F(\overline{U_{a_n}})$. This is the union of countably many nowhere dense sets, and as such it has empty interior, and so, in particular, is nowhere dense. So, $F$ was not surjective in the first place.
I think one could probably actually give a shorter proof using Sard's theorem. If $F$ had constant rank and is not a submersion, then every point in $F$ is a critical point. So, every value of $F$ is a critical value. So, $F(M)$ has measure $0$ in $N$, and consequently $F$ is not surjective.