I know from Jordan Curve Theorem that every simple closed curve separates the plane. For the torus, one curve isn't enough. Not even two of such curves necessarily separates this surface. What I would like to know is what (and why) are the minimum number of closed simple curves necessary to separate a torus, and more generally any other surface.
2026-03-25 17:43:34.1774460614
Minimum number of closed simple curves that separates a surface
185 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Related Questions in NON-ORIENTABLE-SURFACES
- When you divide the real projective plane into two subsets, does it always have exactly one non-orientable component?
- Does Day and Night on a Klein bottle have a steady state?
- Example of a non-orientable 3-manifold
- Is there a way to prove algebraically that a Möbius strip is non-orientable?
- What is the 'center circle' of a Mobius Band?
- Criterion for being in a non-orientable 3 manifold?
- Existence af a Frame on the Klein Bottle
- Immersion of non-orientable manifold in a small orientable one
- Paradromic rings and Mobius strip
- How to arrive at an equation of a Roman surface from three points (a triangle)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $S$ be a surface. I will define two topological invariants of $S$. In both, $C=C(S)$ stands for the set of Jordan curves in $S$.
(a). $$M(S)=\inf \{n: \forall \hbox{ distinct}\ c_1,.., c_k\in C, S\setminus \bigcup_i c_i \ \hbox{is disconnected}\}$$
(b). $$m(S)= \sup \{k: \exists \hbox{ distinct}\ c_1,..., c_n\in C, S\setminus \bigcup_i c_i\ \hbox{is connected}\}$$
Clearly, $M(S)=m(S)+1$. You are interested in computing $M(S)$. I will be computing $m(S)$ instead, but only in the case $S=T^2$ since the general case looks like a difficult combinatorial problem. I will describe steps in computation but skip some of the more unpleasant details.
Suppose that $S$ is a compact surface, $c_1,...,c_n\in C$ are such that $S\setminus \bigcup_i c_i$ is connected. Then the above union of curves $c_i$ is a finite graph embedded in $S$. This is the most unpleasant part of the proof, the key is to show that for all $i, j$, the intersection $c_i\cap c_j$ is a finite union of arcs and points in $c_i$.
If $G$ is a finite graph in a compact surface $S$, then $S$ can be triangulated so that $G$ is a subgraph of the 1-dimensional skeleton of the triangulation. This step is essentially contained in Epstein's paper
Epstein, D. B. A., Curves von 2-manifolds and isotopies, Acta Math. 115, 83-107 (1966). ZBL0136.44605.
Indeed, since $S=T^2$, if $S\setminus \bigcup_i c_i$ is connected, then either $n=0$ or the above complement is homeomorphic to the (open) annulus and, hence, $n=1$.
Remark. Note that if $n=1$, then $n\ne m(S)$ since one can add to $c_1$ another Jordan curve $c_2$ which intersects $c_1$ in a single point. Then $c_1\cup c_2$ still does not disconnect $S$.
Now, we are back to the case of a general compact surface $S$. Suppose that $c_1,...,c_n\in C$ are such that $S\setminus \bigcup_i c_i$ is simply-connected. Then $S$ can be obtained from a planar polygon $P$ by identifying boundary segments in pairs so that the projection of the boundary of $P$ to $S$ is the graph $G= \bigcup_i c_i$.
Let $G\subset S$ be a graph as in (4). Without loss of generality we may assume that each vertex of $G$ has valence $\ne 2$ (otherwise we simply erase such a vertex). Moreover, since $c_1,...,c_n$ are Jordan curves, no vertex of $G$ can have valence $1$. Hence, each vertex has valence $\ge 3$.
Suppose that $G\subset S$ is a graph where each vertex has valence $\ge 3$ and $S\setminus G$ is simply-connected. Let $V$ and $E$ denote the number of vertices and edges in $E$ respectively. We have: $$ \chi(S)= V- E +1 $$ and, since each vertex has valence $\ge 3$, $$ \frac{2}{3}E\ge V. $$
Now, assume again that $S=T^2$. Then $\chi(S)=0$, $V=E-1$. By combining this equation and the inequality from (6), we obtain $E\le 3$. Clearly, $2\le E$, thus, either $E=2$ or $E=3$. The former case is realized by the graph $G$ which is the projection of the boundary of the square to the torus under the standard identification. (Here $V=1$.) This graph contains exactly two distinct Jordan curves. However, the case $E=3$ is also realized! Specifically, take a regular planar hexagon $P$ and identify its opposite sides by translations. The resulting space is $T^2$ and the projection of the boundary of $P$ to $T^2$ is the $\theta$-graph, i.e. the graph with two vertices and three edges (the picture of the letter $\theta$). Observe that the $\theta$-graph contains three distinct Jordan curves. Thus, we constructed distinct $c_1, c_2, c_3\in C$ such that $C\setminus (c_1\cup c_2\cup c_3)$ is connected. Hence, $m(T^2)\ge 3$. At the same time, we also proved that $m(T^2)\le 3$.
Conclusion: $m(T^2)=3$, $M(T^2)=4$.