Lets say we have a set $A$. Suppose that $A$ is ordered by $<$, $A$ is completely ordered.
$<$ can be defined as $<:=\{(a,b) \in A\times A : a<b \}$
- Given that $<$ is transitive, it is not necesary to know all the values of $<$, so what is the minimum amount of pairs in $<$ needed to know all the values of $<$. For example: Let $A = \{a,b,c,d,e\}$. Suppose we know $a<b$, $c<d$, $d<e$, $ e<a$. From that, we can conclude that $c<d<e<a<b$, so we know all the values of $<$ .
- Is there an algorithm to find that/those minimum sets?
We need at least $n-1$ entries of $\lt$ to uniquely reconstruct the total order. Construct an undirected graph $G$ with vertex set $A$ by adding an edge $xy$ if and only if we know the relative ordering between $x$ and $y$. It is easy to see if the total order can be uniquely reconstructed from the entries, then $G$ must be connected; hence $G$ should have at least $n-1$ edges.
In fact, $n-1$ entries suffice as well. For example, if we know that $a_1 < a_2 < \cdots < a_{n-1} < a_n$, then the total order is completely specified.