Does the concept of modular multiplicative inverse require a proof or is it taken as a definition?
Suppose $5/4 \equiv 3$ (mod $7$).
Can that even be written in the standard $a = bq + r$ notation and proven from there?
Does the concept of modular multiplicative inverse require a proof or is it taken as a definition?
Suppose $5/4 \equiv 3$ (mod $7$).
Can that even be written in the standard $a = bq + r$ notation and proven from there?
What the statement means is that $5 \times 4^{-1} \equiv 3 \pmod{7}$.
The modular inverse of $4$ is defined as the number $x$ such that $4x\equiv 1 \pmod{7}$ (if it exists), and it's easy to check that $x=2$ satisfies this.
So $5 \times 4^{-1} \equiv 5 \times 2 \equiv 3 \pmod{7}$.
Alternatively, $5/4$ can be defined as the number that when multiplied by $4$, gives $5$, and $3 \times 4\equiv 12 \equiv 5 \pmod{7}$ as required.