Solve the inequality $$2|x-3| > |3x+1|$$ Is sketching the only way I can solve ALL modulus equations and inequalities? Does an algebraic technique work for all modulus equations and inequalities?
2026-03-27 23:38:31.1774654711
Modulus Inequality
612 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSOLUTE-VALUE
- To find the Modulus of a complex number
- What does $|a| = |b|$ is equal to?
- Symmetric polynomial written in elementary polynomials
- If $|ax^2+bx+c|\le \frac12$ for all $|x|\le1$, then $|ax^2+bx+c|\le x^2-\frac12$ for all $|x|\ge1$
- Proving that a double integral converges
- Equation system
- If $\sqrt{9−8\cos 40^{\circ}} = a +b\sec 40^{\circ}$, then what is $|a+b|$?
- Proving that inequalities $\|a\|_{\infty} \leq \|a\|_2 \leq \sqrt{n} \|a\|_{\infty}$ are true and sharp.
- Find a number $M$, such that $|x^3-4x^2+x+1| < M$ for all $1<x<3$
- Absolute Value of a Complex Number Inequality
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For generic absolute value inequalities, especially those with multiple summations, you can always split it up into regions where you know the value of the absolute value.
As an example, using the above equality, the regions are where $ x \leq -\frac{1}{3}$, $- \frac{1}{3} \leq x \leq 3$ and $ 3 \leq x $.
Case 1: $ x \leq -\frac{1}{3}$
We have $-2 ( x-3) > -(3x+1) \Rightarrow x> -7$.
Combined with the region that we're in, we have $ -7 < x \leq - \frac{1}{3} $.
Case 2: $- \frac{1}{3} \leq x \leq 3$
We have $-2(x-3) > (3x+1) \Rightarrow 5 > 5x \Rightarrow 1 > x$
Combined with the region that we're in, we have $ - \frac{1}{3} \leq x < 1$.
Case 3: $ 3 \leq x $.
We have $2(x-3) > (3x+1) \Rightarrow -7 > x$.
Combined with the region that we're in, there are no solution.
Combining all the regions, we get $ -7 < x < 1$.
Alternative approach:
I would not advise this approach, unless you absolutely understand absolute values and WHY this works. In this special inequality, we can simply square everything, since
$$2|x-3| > |3x+1| \Leftrightarrow [2(x-3)]^2 > (3x+1)^2$$
This is equivalent to $0 > 5(x-1)(x+7) \Rightarrow -7 < x < 1$.