Take the manifold $M$ to be $M=\mathbb{R}^6=\mathbb{R}^3\times\mathbb{R}^3$ (hence $x\in M$ is given by $x=(p,q)$ with $p$ and $q$ three dimensional vectors) and take the possion bracket on $M$ given by $$\{f,g\}=\sum_{i=1}^3{(\frac{\partial f}{\partial p_i}\frac{\partial g}{\partial q_i}-\frac{\partial f}{\partial q_i}\frac{\partial g}{\partial p_i})}$$ Assume $G=\mathbb{R}^6$ acts on M by $(p',q')\cdot(p,q)=(p+p',q+q')$. The question is to show that this action is Hamiltonian with momentum map $J(p,q)=(q,-p)$. By definition we have to show that $\delta_T(f)=\{J_T,f\}$ for each $T\in\mathfrak{g}$ (the Lie algebra of $G$ (which is in this case $\mathbb{R}^6$)) and each $f\in C^{\infty}(M)$. Here $J$ is the momentum map $J:M\rightarrow\mathfrak{g}^*$ and $J_T(x)=J(x)(T)$. But how to show that claim? Can someone help me with this problem? Thanks a lot.
2026-03-25 11:10:24.1774437024
Moment map and Hamiltonian
212 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in POISSON-GEOMETRY
- How to show that $t \subset g$ is a Lie sub-bialgebra if and only if $t^{\perp} \subset g^*$ is an ideal?
- Poisson bracket and curl - Second equation of MHD
- An analogue of the Poisson bracket in contact geometry?
- poisson and hamiltonian vector fields
- q-quantization of Lie bialgebras
- How exactly do I compute Poisson-Lie brackets?
- proof of the Jacobi Identity for certain poisson brackets
- Proving Jacobi identity for Poisson bracket using antisymmetric matrix
- Casimir Functions of Poisson Structure
- Intuition about Poisson bracket
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
@Arnetta, The action by translation is symplectic, thus hamiltonian ; since $\mathbb{R}^6$ is contractible. The fundamental vector fields associated to the basis $\{e_1,...,e_6\}$ of $\mathrm{Lie}(\mathbb{R}^6,+)$ are : $\partial_{x_i}$ $(i=1,...,6)$. Since the symplectic form is $\omega=\sum_{i=1}^3dx_i\wedge dx_{i+3}$, then, for $i=1,2,3$, $$i_{\partial_{x_i}}\omega=dx_{i+3}\quad\text{and}\quad i_{\partial_{x_{i+3}}}\omega=-dx_i$$ The moment map is of the form $J(p,q)=(q+u,-p+v)$, for any constant vectors $u,v\in\mathbb{R}^3$. But you can check, these maps are not equivariant!