$\nabla b \times \hat{z}$ using index notation

41 Views Asked by At

$b$ is a scalar, $\hat z$ is the unit vector in the vertical direction and I need to evaluate a vector $$\vec{v} = \nabla b \times \hat{z}.$$

What I have done so far:

$$\vec{v} = \nabla b \times \hat{z} = \epsilon_{123}\frac{\partial b}{\partial x_2}e_3e_1 + \epsilon_{213}\frac{\partial b}{\partial x_1}e_3e_2 = \frac{\partial b}{\partial x_2}\delta_{31} - \frac{\partial b}{\partial x_1}\delta_{32} = \frac{\partial b}{\partial x_2} - \frac{\partial b}{\partial x_1}$$

which is definitely wrong because $\vec{v}$ should be a vector. It might be something obvious I can't find but I would like to know exactly each component of $\vec{v}$.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

In Einstein summation its $$ \vec v _i= \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_j b \hat z_k$$ so $$ \vec v = \epsilon_{1jk} \partial_j b \hat z_k \hat x + \epsilon_{2jk} \partial_j b \hat z_k \hat y+ \epsilon_{3jk} \partial_j b \hat z_k \hat z$$ Since the only nonzero component of $\hat z$ is $\hat z_3 = 1$, \begin{align} \vec v &= \epsilon_{1j3} \partial_j b \hat z_3 \hat x + \epsilon_{2j3} \partial_j b \hat z_3 \hat y+ \epsilon_{3j3} \partial_j b \hat z_3 \hat z \\ &= \epsilon_{1j3} \partial_j b \hat x + \epsilon_{2j3} \partial_j b \hat y+ \epsilon_{3j3} \partial_j b \hat z\end{align} The $\hat z$ component is zero because $\epsilon_{3j3}= 0$ which we could have directly seen before any computation from the fact that $\vec a\times \vec b $ and $\vec b$ are perpendicular. Now since $\epsilon_{123}=1$ and $\epsilon_{213}=-1$ are the only relevant non-zero terms,

$$ \vec v = \partial_2 b \hat x - \partial_1 b \hat y$$

It seems your mistake was saying that the third component of $\hat z$ is $e_3$, but a component of a vector is not another vector, it is a scalar.

5
On

In cartesian coordinates you have $$ v=\nabla b \times w = \sum_{i,j,k=1}^3 \epsilon_{ijk}\partial_ib\,w_je_k $$ where $e_k$ are the basis vectors. Try expanding the sum. There should be $27$ terms, $21$ of which will be zero because of the $\epsilon_{ijk}$ terms, so only $6$ will survive.

For example, the first two terms are $$ v= \epsilon_{111}\partial_1b\,w_1e_1 + \epsilon_{112}\partial_1b\,w_1e_2 +\dots $$