What's the natural deduction of this exercise?
Premise: $\lnot p \lor \lnot q$
Conclusion: $\lnot(p\land q)$
I must have something like the following, but I do not know how to start.

What's the natural deduction of this exercise?
Premise: $\lnot p \lor \lnot q$
Conclusion: $\lnot(p\land q)$
I must have something like the following, but I do not know how to start.

Proof sketch:
$\lnot p \lor \lnot q$ (premise)
$\quad |\underline{\text{(Assume)}\; p\land q}\;$ (Assumption)
$\quad |\;p\;$ ("$\land$-elimination")
$\quad |\; q\;$ (simplification/$\land$-elimination)
$\qquad |\underline{\;\; \lnot p\;}$ (assumption)
$\qquad | \;\;p \land \lnot p\;$ $\land$-Intro (3, 6)
$\qquad | \;\;$ Contradition. (6)
$\qquad | \underline{\;\; \lnot q\;}$ (assumption)
$\qquad | \;\;q\land \lnot q\;\;\land$-Intro (4, 8)
$\qquad | \;\;$Contradiction (9)
$\quad |\;\;$ Contradiction $\lor$-Elimination (1, 5-10)
$\lnot (p\land q)$ (2-10). Our assumption $p\land q$ leads to a contradiction, so that $\lnot(p \land q)$ is therefore true.