Let $C,D$ be two quasi category, we then have the functor category Fun($C,D$), a natural equivalence is just an equivalence in this functor category. Given a natural equivalence $f: C\times\Delta^1\to D$, then the evaluation $f(id_c,id_{[1]})$ at every $c\in C$ is always an equivalence in $D$. My question is, is the converse true? How can we prove it? In fact, I have no idea how to construct the inverse $g$ of $f$. References or any idea about this is highly welcome.
2026-03-25 23:10:42.1774480242
Natural equivalence in higher category
56 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HIGHER-CATEGORY-THEORY
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- What is an intuitive Geometrical explanation of a "sheaf?"
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Applications of $\infty$-categories
- Simplicial categories and simplicial objectcs. HTT Remark 1.1.4.2
- $n$-categories and associahedrons.
- Weak notion of equivalence in a category
- The $2$-category of monoids
- Higher homotopy groups in terms of the fundamental groupoid
- Pseudolimits equivalent to limits
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is true but nontrivial. Here is a sketch of the proof: construct the model structure on marked simplicial sets and show that it is Cartesian, with fibrant objects the naturally marked quasicategories. The Cartesian property implies in particular that the exponential of a fibrant object by a cofibrant object remains fibrant. That is, if $Q$ is a naturally marked quasicategory (viewed as a marked simplicial set) and $A$ is any marked simplicial set (everything is cofibrant) then the exponential $Q^A$ is a naturally marked quasicategory.
However, the marking on $Q^A$ makes an edge $h: A\times \Delta^1 \to Q$ marked if and only if it sends each pair $(f,\mathrm{id}_{[1]})$, where $\mathrm{id}_{[1]}$ is the nontrivial edge of $\Delta^1$ and $f$ is marked in $A$, to a marked edge (that is, an equivalence) in $Q$. It is not too hard to reduce this using composition in $Q$ to the claim that $h(\mathrm{id}_a,\mathrm{id}_{[1]})$ is marked for every degenerate 1-simplex $\mathrm{id}_a$ in $A$, which is exactly the claim that $h$ is a pointwise equivalence.
So, $Q^A$ has as marked edges the pointwise equivalences, by the construction of the exponential, and must also be a naturally marked quasicategory, so that the marked edges are the legitimate equivalences, and the two classes coincide as desired. I do not know an argument avoiding marked simplicial sets, although Joyal probably gives one. For more details of this argument you can look in Riehl-Verity, The 2-category theory of quasicategories, section 2.3. They leave the construction of the model structure itself to Lurie.