Consider the following statement:
If $f_1(x_1^*) = f_n(x_n^*)$ for all $n \geq 1$, then $x_1^* = x_n^* = 1$ for all $n \geq 1$.
I would like to write down the contrapositive statement. Here is my thinking:
Suppose that there exists an $n \geq 1$ such that $x_n^* \neq 1$, then $f_1(x_1^*) \neq f_n(x_n^*)$.
My question is the following: Do I really need to include the quantifier for the statement after "then"? ;i.e., do I have to say $f_1(x_1^*) \neq f_n(x_n^*)$ for some $n$ ? If so, then I think I have "two $n$" flows around which confuses me a lot. Or can I just recycle the $n$ used in the sentence of "suppose..." Is this the correct way to think of?
Any suggestion is appreciated.
It's clear here that the two $n$'s refer to different $n$, as for both statements it's explained that they hold for any $n$. Nevertheless, you repeated the quantifier, as you should.
When you make the contrapositive, you should especially also repeat the quantifier to make sure the reader understands we're talking about different $n$, especially because in this case we're considering specific values of $n$:
Even better would be to use a different variable to completely remove ambiguity.