Let $\mathcal{P}_{n,2d}$ denote the real forms of degree $2d$ in $n$ variables and $\Sigma_{n,2d}$ the forms that can be written as sums of squares. The Motzkin-polynomial shows that $\mathcal{P}_{3,6}\neq\Sigma_{3,6}$. Starting with this polynomial, how does one get counter examples for higher degrees or higher number of variables?
2026-03-25 10:55:25.1774436125
Non-negative polynomials and sums of squares
180 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How can one prove that this polynomial is non-negative?
- Does an irreducible real affine algebraic set/ its complement has finitely many connected components in the Euclidean topology?
- How to proof a real variety is not locally a manifold
- Characterizations of bounded real zero sets
- Why is the set of all $x \in \mathbb{R}$ satisfying $ x^2 - 8x + 15 \leq 0 $ representable as a polyhedron?
- Lebesgue measure of a semi-algebraic set
- Disjoint Union Basic-Closed Semialgebraic Sets
- Is union of matrices of different ranks a submanifold?
- Is the image of the map $A \to \bigwedge^{k}A $ from matrices of a given rank closed?
- Algebraic curves of odd degree - only finitely many lines through the origin fail to intersect
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
So first for higher number of variables, you can take again the Motzkin polynomial $M$: Assume that $M$ is a sum of squares of polynomials in $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ with $n>3$. Then by setting $x_4=\ldots=x_n=0$ we get a sum of squares representation of $M$ with polynomials in $x_1,x_2,x_3$ which does not exist.
For higher degree consider $P=x_1^{2d} \cdot M$. If $P=g_1^2+\ldots+g_r^2$ for some polynomials $g_i$, then each $g_i$ must vanish on the hyperplane $x_1=0$. Thus every $g_i$ is divisible by $x_1$ and by dividing both sides by $x_1^2$ you get a sum of squares representation of $x_1^{2d-2}\cdot M$. You iterate this until you have a sum of squares representation of $M$ which is a contradiction.