Assume $R\subseteq S$ are rings. Choose $x\in S$ nonintegral over $R$. I want to define a homomorphism from $R[x^{-1}]$ to a field which maps $x^{-1}$ to zero.
I was trying to show that $R[x^{-1}]$ is a polynomial ring in one variable. Then I could define my map in this way $\sum_{i=0}^mr_i'(x^{-1})^i\longmapsto r_0$.
It's clear that I can show elements of $R[x^{-1}]$ like $\sum_{i=0}^nr_i(x^{-1})^i$ but at the remained part I got have a problem. I mean when I want to show that if $\sum_{i=0}^nr_i(x^{-1})^i=\sum_{i=0}^mr_i'(x^{-1})^i$ then $n=m$ and for all i, $r_i=r_i'$.
My attempt was in this way;
Let $n\geq m$, from our assumption we have $\sum_{i=0}^nr_i''(x^{-1})^i=0$ which for $0\leq i\leq m$, $r_i''=r_i-r_i'$ and for $m+1\leq i\leq n$, $r_i''=r_i$. By multiplying by $x^n$, $r_0''x^n+r_1''x^{n-1}+\cdots+r_{n-1}''x+r_n''=0$. If I were able to make this relation monic then it would be a contradiction and the problem was solved but $r_0''$ may be not invertible so what should I do now?
By the example which 'Hans' brought at below my approach was wrong.
Let $x$ be nonintegral on your ring $R$ then I claim it is not in the ring $R[x^{-1}]$. Because otherwise $$x=a_nx^{-n}+\cdots+a_1x^{-1}+a_0$$ For some $a_i$s in $R$. By multiplying both sides of our equality to $x^n$ we will have $$x^{n+1}=a_n+\cdots+a_1x^{n-1}+a_0x^n$$ But it gives an integral relation for $x$ on $R$ and thus contradiction. So we showed our claim is correct.
But $x\notin R[x^{-1}]$ means $x^{-1}$ is nonunit in $R[x^{-1}]$ so there is a maximal ideal of $R[x^{-1}]$ say $\mathfrak{m}$ containing it. Denote the algebraic closure of the residual field $\dfrac{R[x^{-1}]}{\mathfrak{m}}$ by $k$. And define the ring homomorphism $\phi$ be composition of the following two ring homomorphisms. $$R[x^{-1}]\overset{\pi}{\longrightarrow}\dfrac{R[x^{-1}]}{\mathfrak{m}}\overset{j}{\longrightarrow}k$$ Which the first one is the canonical map and the second one is inclusion.
$\phi$ is a ring homomorphism from $R[x^{-1}]$ to an algebraic closed field which its kernel is exactly $\mathfrak{m}$ and thus nontrivial.