From Wikipedia:
$G(V,E)$ is a finite directed graph in which every edge $\ (u,v) \in E$ has a non-negative, real-valued capacity $\ c(u,v)$. A flow network is a real function $\ f:V \times V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ with the following three properties for all nodes $\ u$ and $\ v$:
Capacity constraints: ...
Skew symmetry: $\ f(u,v) = - f(v,u)$. The net flow from $\ u$ to $\ v$ must be the opposite of the net flow from $\ v$ to $\ u$.
What exactly is the use of Skew symmetry? I didn't see this property being used anywhere? Basically whats the use of keeping a negative flow from v to u?
This is not entirely standard - different sources do this differently. If we do use skew-symmetry, then the advantage is that the expression $$\sum_{v \in V} f(v,w)$$ represents the net flow into a vertex $w$: the total flow entering $w$, minus the total flow leaving $w$. This is because (with skew-symmetry) the expression $f(v,w)$ represents both the flow entering $w$ via edge $(v,w)$ and (with a negative sign) the flow leaving $w$ via edge $(w,v)$.
The other approach to representing flows, which I'll define with a function $g$ to distinguish it, is to represent only the flow from $v$ to $w$ by $g(v,w)$, and require $0 \le g(v,w) \le c(v,w)$. In cases where $(v,w)$ and $(w,v)$ are both edges with positive capacity, both $g(v,w)$ and $g(w,v)$ could be positive, independently, though this is redundant. (For example, rather than sending $2$ flow from $v$ to $w$ and $1$ flow from $w$ to $v$, it's equivalent to only send $1$ flow from $v$ to $w$, and $0$ flow from $w$ to $v$.)
Then $g(v,w)$ is simpler to understand (it only represents one thing) but the net flow into a vertex $w$ has a more complicated expression: it is given by $$\sum_{v \in V}g(v,w) - \sum_{v \in V} g(w,v).$$ The first sum represents the flow into $w$, and the second sum represents the flow out of $w$.
We can go back and forth between the two representations: