In my knot theory class homework I encountered the following question:
Prove that for every link, when calculating the Wirtinger presentation of the fundamental group of its complement, you can always omit the last relation in the list.
I tried looking at the last crossing (in a given numbering of the crossings) and find another relation(s) that involves its three generators. It seems - although I can't find a way to prove it - that they always have to appear in other relations too, but I can't seem to find a method to express them. Can anyone help?
This statement is given often without a proof. For example in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/knot+group#the_wirtinger_presentation we can read Hint: If doing an example, do not throw away a crossing relation just because it is redundant.. Moreover the same question has been already asked on Math Overflow: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/251292/why-is-any-one-wirtinger-relation-a-consequence-of-the-remainder (and probably more than just one time) but I couldn't find any answers so let's write one :)
Proof from Rolfsen's Knots and links (pages 56-60):
There is a picture on page 59 if you have problems imagining the above. In particular, $*$ is a base point above the knot diagram where all loops (elements of $\pi_1$) start and end.