I have a question. We know by theory that any von Neumann algebra is direct integral of factors. Then how to get the decomposition in practical situation. Basically what is the decomposition examples for abelian vN algebras, Group vN algebras such that group is not i.c.c, and $\mathbb{B}(\mathcal{H})\otimes L^{\infty}(X,\mu)$. Thanks in advance!
2026-03-27 16:47:51.1774630071
On Direct integral decomposition of von Neumann algebras
357 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in C-STAR-ALGEBRAS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is a $*$-representation $\pi:A\to B(H)$ non-degenerate iff $\overline{\pi(A) B(H)} = B(H)$?
- Spectral theorem for inductive limits of $C^*$-Algebras
- Examples of unbounded approximate units in $C^*$-algebras
- Is there a way to describe these compactifications algebraically?
- Projections in C*-algebras
- Homogeneous C*-algebras
Related Questions in VON-NEUMANN-ALGEBRAS
- An embedding from the $C(X) \rtimes_{\alpha,r}\Gamma$ into $L^{\infty}(X) \ltimes \Gamma$.
- Are atomic simple C*-algebras von Neumann algebras?
- weak operator topology convergence and the trace of spectral projections
- Reference request for the following theorem in Von Neumann algebras.
- Is the bidual of a C*-algebra isomorphic to the universal enveloping von Nemann algebra as a Banach algebra?
- von Neumann algebra
- L2 norm convergence on (bounded ball of) *-subalgebra of von Neumann algebra
- Traces on $K(H)$
- Why is $M_n(A)$ a von Neumann algebra
- Clarification on proof in Murphy's C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is no "practical situation", my opinion (with a small caveat mentioned at the end). Any von Neumann algebra that is expressed to you in a somewhat concrete way, is more amenable to manipulation than a direct integral. People (very) seldom use direct integrals to prove some general fact, not to understand their algebras.
For example, an abelian von Neumann algebra is $L^\infty(X,\mu)$ for some measure space. Suppose $X$ is $\mathbb R^n$, or $\mathbb C^n$, or one of many many other nontrivial measure spaces. Writing your algebra as a direct integral of uncountable many copies of $\mathbb C$ gives you nothing. Similarly, on $B(H)\otimes L^\infty(X,\mu)$ you can see the centre directly (it's $I\otimes L^\infty(X,\mu)$) and do stuff; writing the algebra as a direct integral of uncountably many copies of $B(H)$ gives you nothing of value.
In the case of group von Neumann algebras I don't have much to say. Mostly because I don't really remember if one can characterize the centre explicitly: the only case where the direct integral decomposition can be useful is the case where you have minimal central projections, because in that case you can write the decomposition rather explicitly. That said, I don't think it is usual to be able to write projections in a group von Neumann algebras explicitly (I might be wrong, I haven't played with group algebras in a very long time).
The only case where the direct integral decomposition is meaningful is in the case of finite-dimensional algebras. A finite-dimensional von Neumann algebra is of the form $\bigoplus_{k=1}^m M_{m_k}(\mathbb C)$. That's precisely the direct integral decomposition (over a finite measure space, that's why it's tractable).