I am a bit confused about the use of the bijection symbol against the equality symbol when dealing with hom-sets. I will give an example. Suppose you want to prove that every functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{E}$ factors as $F^*\circ F_*$, where the functors $F_*:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D}$ and $F^*:\mathcal{D}\to\mathcal{E}$ satisfy $F_*$ bijective on objects and $F^*$ full and faithful (for some category $\mathcal{D}$). What you do is, define the objects of $\mathcal{D}$ to be the objects of $\mathcal{C}$ and $\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}(a,b)=\text{Hom}_\mathcal{E}(Fa,Fb)$. You then define $F_*:\mathcal{C}\to\mathcal{D}$ by $F_*a=a$, $F_*f=Ff$ and $F^*:\mathcal{D}\to \mathcal{E}$ by $F^*a=Fa$, $F^*f=f$. To prove that $F^*$ is full and faithful, it is enough to prove, by the definition of "full and faithful", that $$\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{E}}(F^*a,F^*b)\cong \text{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}(a,b)$$ My question is, in the following sequence of "relations" (word used here in the non-mathematical context) between the hom-sets ("relations" symbolized by a square), which squares are equalities and which are bijections? $$\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{E}}(F^*a,F^*b)\; \square \;\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{E}}(Fa,Fb)\;\square\;\text{Hom}_{\mathcal{D}}(a,b)$$ (of course the first "relation" comes from the definition of $F^*$ and the second by the definition of the category $\mathcal{D}$)
2026-04-09 03:34:15.1775705655
On recognizing equality against bijection of hom-sets (in a locally small category).
96 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
By the construction written above, there is equality in both places, exactly because of the definitions of $F^*$ and $\mathcal D$, as you say.
However, if you want to be extra precise, and the current definition of category you are using assumes that $\hom(A,B)$ is disjoint from all other homsets, then you have to pay more attention at the definition of $\mathcal D$, and define e.g. $$\hom_{\mathcal D}(a,b):=\left\{\,\langle a,\varphi,b\rangle\ \mid\ \varphi\in\hom_{\mathcal E}(Fa,Fb)\,\right\}\,.$$ All the rest is OK, so we will have $F^*a=Fa\ $ (and $F^*(\langle a,f,b\rangle ):=Ff$), $\,$hence $\hom_{\mathcal E}(F^*a,F^*b)\ =\ \hom_{\mathcal E}(Fa,Fb)$, but the other one is only $$\hom_{\mathcal E}(Fa,Fb)\ \cong\ \hom_{\mathcal D}(a,b)\,.$$