I'm studying Lang's Linear Algebra and stumbled upon a lemma prior to the unique factorization of polynomials that says the following "Let p be irreducible in K[t]. Let f, g be non-zero polynomials in K[t]. Assume p divides fg, then p divides f or p divides g". I've come up with a counter example, let p(x)=x^2+1 (which is an irreducible polynomial over the Reals), f(x)=(x^2+1)^2 and g(x)=(x^2+1)^3, thus f(x)g(x)=(x^2+1)^5 in which p divides both f and g. I've also tried (dis)proving it in the following way "Let h,a,b,c,d be polynomials in K[t] such that ph=fg, pa+fb=1 and pc+gd=1, if we multiply the second equation by g and the third one by f to get pga+fgb=g and pfc+gfd=f but fg=gf=ph thus pga+fgb=pga+phb=p(ga+hb)=g and pfc+gfd=pfc+phd=p(fc+hd)=f meaning both f and g can by divided by p". What am I doing wrong??? Thanks
2026-04-03 16:23:04.1775233384
On Unique factorization of polynomials
65 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in POLYNOMIALS
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Can $P^3 - Q^2$ have degree 1?
- System of equations with different exponents
- Can we find integers $x$ and $y$ such that $f,g,h$ are strictely positive integers
- Dividing a polynomial
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- Polyomial function over ring GF(3)
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- $x^{2}(x−1)^{2}(x^2+1)+y^2$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{C}[x,y].$
Related Questions in IRREDUCIBLE-POLYNOMIALS
- $x^{2}(x−1)^{2}(x^2+1)+y^2$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{C}[x,y].$
- Is the following polynomial irreductible over $\mathbb{Z}[X]$?
- Does irreducibility in $\mathbb{F}_p[x]$ imply irreducibility in $\mathbb{Q}[x]$?
- discriminant and irreducibility of $x^p - (p+1)x - 1$
- galois group of irreducible monic cubic polynomial
- When will $F[x]/\langle p(x)\rangle$ strictly contain $F$?
- On reducibility over $\mathbb{Z}$ of a special class of polynomials .
- Eisenstein's criterion over polynomials irreducible
- Optimal normal basis in Tower field construction
- If $f$ has $\deg(f)$ distince roots whose order are the same, then is $f$ irreducible?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I repeat the answer for the sake of completeness: it's not an exclusive OR. $p$ can divide $f$ and $g.$
The interesting observation, however, is a different one. The statement $$ p(t)\,|\,f(t)\cdot g(t) \Longrightarrow p(t)\,|\,f(t)\, \vee \,p(t)\,|\,g(t) $$ for polynomials $p(t),f(t),g(t)\in K[t],$ where $K$ is a field, is exactly the definition for $p(t)$ being a prime element in the ring $K[t].$ The theorem above therefore proves:
Every irreducible polynomial in $K[t]$ is prime.
The converse is also true: every prime polynomial is irreducible.