I need to prove that the only linear transformations $f\colon M_{n\times n}\rightarrow M_{n\times n}$that solve the functional equation in $\mathcal{L}(M_{n\times n})$ $$f(XY)=f(X)Y+Xf(Y)$$ are the commutators. That is, I have to show that for every linear solution $f$ there exists a matrix $A$ such that $f(X)=[A,X]$ for all $X$. Bearing in mind that every commutator satisfies the equation, I have tried to solve this studying the sets $V_A=\{X\in M_{n \times n}\colon f(X)=[A,X]\}$, where $A\in \ker f$, which happen to be subalgebras that are stable under $f$ and include inverses. Specifically, I have been looking for a maximality argument that leads me to conclude that some of these $V_A$ must be all of $M_{n\times n}$. So far, I have not been able to exploit the finite dimension of $M_{n\times n}$. This problem appears as an exercise at the end of an introductory chapter on matrices and finite dimensional vector spaces in Katsumi Nomizu's Fundamentals of Linear Algebra, so little else beyond the rank-nullity theorem is assumed.
2026-04-24 00:27:49.1776990469
Only commutators solve this functional equation
163 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-EQUATIONS
- Functional equation $2f\left(\frac{x+y}{2}\right)-f(y)=f''(x)$
- How to solve the integral equation $f(x) = \int_0^x f(x-y)k(x,y)dy+g(x)$ for $f(x)$?
- Easy looking functional equation.
- Constructing a functional equation that has given solution set.
- Solution of $f(ax+b)=kf(x)$ with $k,a,b$ are real numbers
- Deriving $\sin(\pi s)=\pi s\prod_{n=1}^\infty (1-\frac{s^2}{n^2})$ without Hadamard Factorization
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- How to solve the functional equation $f(x + f(x +y ) ) = f(2x) + y$?
- Solution to the functional equation $f(z)=(-1)^zf(1-z)$???
- If $f(a,b)=f(a,c)f(c,b)$ for all $a,b,c$, when can we conclude $f(a,b)=g(a)/g(b)$ for some $g$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is an elementary proof. Denote the underlying field by $\mathbb F$. Pick two vectors $u,v\in\mathbb F^n$ such that $u^Tv=I_1$, the $1\times1$ identity matrix. Since $f$ is linear, so are the mappings $x\mapsto f(xu^T)v\in\mathbb F^n$ and $y\mapsto u^Tf(vy^T)\in\mathbb F^{1\times n}$. Hence there exist two matrices $A$ and $B$ such that $f(xu^T)v=Ax$ and $u^Tf(vy^T)=y^TB$ for all $x,y\in\mathbb F^n$. It follows that \begin{aligned} f(xy^T) &=f\left(x(u^Tv)y^T\right)\\ &=f\left((xu^T)(vy^T)\right)\\ &=f(xu^T)vy^T+xu^Tf(vy^T)\\ &=Axy^T+xy^TB.\\ \end{aligned} Since $M_n(\mathbb F)$ is spanned by the set of all rank-one matrices, the above gives $f(X)=AX+XB$ for all matrices $X$. However, as $f(I)=f(I^2)=f(I)I+If(I)=2f(I)$, we must have $f(I)=0$. Hence $A+B=0$ and $f(X)=AX+XB=[A,X]$.