Why is there only the trivial automorphism on the Frucht graph?
We have a rooted tree in the Frucht graph which allows to totally order the vertices. But how does this imply that there is only the identity on the Frucht graph?
Why is there only the trivial automorphism on the Frucht graph?
We have a rooted tree in the Frucht graph which allows to totally order the vertices. But how does this imply that there is only the identity on the Frucht graph?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
The graph contains exactly three triangles (induced graphs isomorphic to $K_3$) so these must be permuted by any automorphism. Now look at the distances between these triangles: an automorphism must preserve them; exactly one triangle is one edge away from the other two, so it must be preserved by an isomorphism. This almost gets you there. Now finish :-)
Alternatively, there are three vertices which are not in triangles, so they must be permuted among themselves by an automorphism. Exactly one of these three vertices, call it $v$, is at distance three from one of the triangles, so it must be fixed by any automorphism; now exacty one of the other special vertices is at distance one from $v$, so it must be fixed, and the other special vertex must then also be fixed. We thus see that the three vertices not on triangles must be fixed. Continue in this way.