I'm having trouble understanding the order topology. If we consider $R_{\ge 0} \times R_{\ge 0}$ given the order topology coming from the lexicographic order, my understanding is that the sets $[2,3] \times (2,3)$, $(2,3) \times [2,3]$, $(2,3) \times (2,3)$ are all open. For the set $[2,3] \times (2,3)$, for any $\langle x,y \rangle \in [2,3] \times (2,3)$, the nbhd $((x,\dfrac{2+y}{2}),(y,\dfrac{3+y}{2})) \subset [2,3]\times(2,3)$ and contains points $p,q$ such that $p < \langle x,y\rangle < q$. Thus, the set $[2,3] \times (2,3)$ is open. $(2,3) \times [2,3]$ and $(2,3)\times(2,3)$ follow by similar logic. However, the set $[0,2) \times [0,\infty)$ is not open because there does not exist a open nbhd around $\langle 0,0\rangle$. Is my understanding correct?
2026-02-23 06:36:23.1771828583
Open sets in the order topology
278 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in ORDER-TOPOLOGY
- Open sets on ordered topology in $\mathbb{R\times R}$
- The lub of the usual and co-countable topology on $\mathbb R$
- Closed subsets of regular cardinals
- Right continuous functions when considered with lower limit topology
- $\omega_1$ is a limit point of the subset $[0,\omega_1)$
- Can the long line be embedded in the ordered plane?
- If $f\colon X\to Y$ is continuous and $X$ is compact Hausdorff and connected, $Y$ is given an order topology. Is $f$ necessarily onto?
- How is this definition of closedness compatible with the order topology?
- Order Topology on a Preorder
- Help me to visualise limit points of $S$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is actually a great question for increasing your understanding of the lexicographic order. To recall, in this order, $(a,b) < (c,d)$ if and only if either $a<c$ or $a=c$ and $b<d$. (This is exactly how we sort words when alphabetizing, for example in a dictionary—hence the name "lexicographic".)
So for your first remark: it's not actually true (when $x\ne y$) that $$ \bigg(\bigg(x,\dfrac{2+y}{2}\bigg),\bigg(y,\dfrac{3+y}{2}\bigg)\bigg) \subset [2,3]\times(2,3). $$ Take for example $x=2.1$ and $y=2.4$. Note that every single element of the form $(2.3,z)$ for $z\in\Bbb R_{\ge0}$ is in the interval $\big( (2.1,2.2), (2.4,2.7) \big)$. In particular, $(2.3,4)$ is in that interval, but is not in $[2,3]\times(2,3)$.
A modification of your idea works, however: any $(x,y) \in [2,3]\times(2,3)$ is contained in the neighborhood $$ \bigg(\bigg(x,\dfrac{2+y}{2}\bigg),\bigg(x,\dfrac{3+y}{2}\bigg)\bigg) \subset [2,3]\times(2,3) $$ (note the single difference). Another way of phrasing this idea: an arbitrary union of open sets is always open, and $$ [2,3]\times(2,3) = \bigcup_{x\in[2,3]} \big( \{x\}\times(2,3) \big) $$ where each $\{x\}\times(2,3)$ is open by the above argument.
The same argument (almost exactly) shows that $(2,3)\times(2,3)$ is also an open set in the lexicographic topology.
On the other hand, $(2,3) \times [2,3]$ is not an open set, because it does not contain a neighborhood of $(2.9,2)$ (for example). The elements "just less than" $(2.9,2)$ are of the form $(2.9,y)$ where $y$ is just less than $2$—and no such elements are in $(2,3) \times [2,3]$.
It turns out that the set $[0,2) \times [0,\infty)$ is in fact open. Can you prove this using these ideas?