I located Joseph Fourier's book, Analytial Theory of Heat (1878), but at first glance it looks like it is all about heat. What did Fourier call the Fourier transform? When did he first use it?
2026-04-01 18:31:48.1775068308
Origin of the Fourier Transform (1878)
391 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in FOURIER-SERIES
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- Fourier series expansion of $\frac{\pi^4}{96}$ and $\frac{\pi^4}{90}$
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Fourier series. Find the sum $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{2n+1}$
- How get a good approximation of integrals involving the gamma function, exponentials and the fractional part?
- The convolution theorem for fourier series.:$ \widehat{f*g}(x) =2π\hat{g}(x)\cdot\hat{f}(x) $
- Ergodicity of a skew product
- Fourier Series on $L^1\left(\left[0,1\right)\right)\cap C\left(\left[0,1\right)\right)$
- Parseval's Identity Proof Monotone/Dominated Convergence Theorem
- How can I interchange the sum signs
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Fourier derived what we now refer to as the Fourier sine and Fourier cosine transforms, while studying the heat in a semi-infinite rod.
You'll notice that the above is the composition of (what we now refer to as) the Fourier sine transform with itself. Fourier derived this as a limit of the discrete sine series for a finite rod, as the length of the rod tends to infinity. He argument was not particularly rigorous, even though the result is correct. He did the same with the cosine transform as well.
I've copied this from the free Google book which is an English translation of Fourier's original 1811 manuscript written in French: https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Analytical_Theory_of_Heat/No8IAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
Fourier's manuscript of 1811 was not published until 1822 because of its controversial nature, and only then because Fourier had gained such prominence that he was able to force the issue. Fourier had a lot of brilliant, original, and correct work in his manuscript. His argument for the limit of Fourier series leading to the Fourier integrals is not accepted as correct, even though his final results are correct. But at least this will show you how the Fourier sine and cosine transforms and their inverses arose.