[Ciarlet 1.2-2] Let $O$ be an orthogonal matrix. Show that there exists an orthogonal matrix $Q$ such that $$Q^{-1}OQ\ =\ \left(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrrr} 1 & & & & & & & & & & \\ & \ddots & & & & & & & & & \\ & & 1 & & & & & & & & \\ & & & -1 & & & & & & & \\ & & & & \ddots & & & & & & \\ & & & & & -1 & & & & & \\ & & & & & & \cos\theta_1 & \sin\theta_1 & & & \\ & & & & & & -\sin\theta_1 & \cos\theta_1 & & & \\ & & & & & & & & \ddots & & \\ & & & & & & & & & \cos\theta_r & \sin\theta_r\\ & & & & & & & & & -\sin\theta_r & \cos\theta_r \end{array}\right).$$
2026-04-30 06:16:14.1777529774
Orthogonal Decomposition
712 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in INNER-PRODUCTS
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- How does one define an inner product on the space $V=\mathbb{Q}_p^n$?
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Is the natural norm on the exterior algebra submultiplicative?
- Norm_1 and dot product
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
- Orthonormal set and linear independence
- Inner product space and orthogonal complement
- Which Matrix is an Inner Product
- Proof Verification: $\left\|v-\frac{v}{\|v\|}\right\|= \min\{\|v-u\|:u\in S\}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The key thing is to diagonalise $O$ carefully as a unitary matrix over the complex numbers, and then translate everything into real terms. So:
EDIT: The tl;dr version of steps 2-5
By the spectral theorem for finite-dimensional complex inner product spaces, applied to the unitary matrix $O$, we obtain the orthogonal decomposition $$ \mathbb{C}^n = \ker(O-I) \oplus \ker(O+I) \oplus \bigoplus_{k=1}^r \ker(O-e^{i\theta_k}I) \oplus \ker(O - e^{-i\theta_k}I), $$ However, for each $k$, $(O-e^{i\theta_k}I)(O-e^{-i\theta_k}I) = O^2 + 2\cos(\theta_k)O+I$, so that since $e^{i\theta_k}$ and $e^{-i\theta_k}$ are distinct eigenvalues, $$ \ker(O-e^{i\theta_k}I) \oplus \ker(O - e^{-i\theta_k}I) = \ker(O^2 + 2\cos(\theta_k)O+I), $$ where $O^2 + 2\cos(\theta_k)O+I$ is a perfectly respectable real matrix. Thus, you can check that you obtain an orthogonal decomposition $$ \mathbb{R}^n = \ker(O-I) \oplus \ker(O+I) \oplus \bigoplus_{k=1}^r\ker(O^2 + 2\cos(\theta_k)O+I) $$ in terms of the kernels in $\mathbb{R}^n$ of the real matrices $O-I$, $O+I$, and $O^2 + 2\cos(\theta_k)O+I$. Then, find an orthonormal basis for each of those kernels, take their union in the order given by the above orthogonal decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^n$, and you get the columns of your matrix $Q$.