orthogonal polynomials and determinant of jacobi matrix

169 Views Asked by At

In the book 'Orthogonal Polynomials of Several Variables' by Charles F. Dunkl and Yuan Xu page 11 is the picture below. I assume the matrix in the picture is related to

Corollary 1.3.10 For the case of orthonormal polynomials $p_n$, $xp_n(x)=a_{n-1}p_{n-1}(x)+b_n p_n(x)+a_n p_{n+1}(x)$ and $a_n=k_n/k_{n+1}=\sqrt{d_n d_{n+2}}/d_{n+1}$ where $k_n$ is coeff. leading or highest power of x and $b_n=\int_a^b xp_n(x)^2 d\mu(x)$

which is on the previous page. I understand the matrix identity but I can't understand why he says 'hence $P_n (x)$ = det$(xI_n-J_n)$ In the picture. I know it can be diagonalized by a similarity transform or by even a unitary matrix and have the same determinant. If one could easily show that the eigenvalues(which are the diagonal elements in the diagonalized matrix) were such that each had a maximum power of x for all different powers of x then I could understand that because eigenvectors of symmetric matrices are orthogonal. Note by using the upper case P in $P_n(x)$ it means that generally they are not normalized but instead I would assume they are such that the highest power of x has coefficient 1 or are monic polynomials ? Anyway can anyone explain because of that matrix identity one is supposed to understand. Like what is so special about that matrix identity have to do with orthogonality ? Note disregard that 'mouse' pointer symbol in first row of matrix.

enter image description here

from where does that $P_n(x)=...$ arise ?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

Prior in his book on page 9 and 10 for the special case of monic orthogonal polynomials,his corollary 1.3.8 $P_{n+1}(x)=(x+B_n)P_n(x)-C_nP_{n-1}(x)$ where $C_n=\frac {d_{n+1}d_{n-1}}{d_n^2}$ which equals $a_{n-1}^2$ and $B_n=-\frac{d_n}{d_{n+1}}\int_a^b xP_n(x)^2d\mu(x)=-b_n=-\int_a^b xp_n(x)^2d\mu(x)$ where $p_n(x)$ is orthonormalized eg $\int_a^b p_n(x)^2d\mu(x)=1$, while monic $\int_a^b P_n(x)^2d\mu(x)=\frac{d_{n+1}}{d_n}$. So we have the same recurrence and assuming the initial starting values are the same it is unique. That is assume $P_0=1$ and note $d_0=1$ by his definition and $d_n=det(g_{ij})_{i,j=1}^n$ where $g_{i,j}$ are elements of the Gram matrix $<f_i,f_j>$