If $q\in P^{0}_{k}(I)$, i.e $q$ is a polynomial of degree $\leq k$ that vanishes at two end points of the interval $I=(0,1)$ and $$\psi(x)=\frac{(-1)^{k-1}}{k!}\frac{1}{x(1-x)}\frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}[x^{k+1}(1-x)^{k}].$$ How I will prove that $\int^{1}_{0}\psi(x)q(x)=0,~\forall q\in P^{0}_{k}(I).$ Please help. I will be grateful.
2026-03-26 11:05:02.1774523102
Orthogonality of functions related to Legendre polynomials
207 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORTHOGONAL-POLYNOMIALS
- Is there something like "associated" Chebyshev polynomials?
- What is the difference between Orthogonal collocation and Weighted Residual Methods
- Calculate Stieltjes Polynomial
- How do I show this :$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} x^n 2\cosh( x)e^{-x^2}=0$ if it is true with $n$ odd positive integer?
- Gegenbauer functions and applications (esp. circular envelope special case)?
- Calculating coefficient of approximation polynomial which is expanded in to a series of Legendre Polynomials
- If $P_n(1)=1$ calculate $P'_n(1)$ in Legendre polynomials
- Linear Functional and Orthogonal polynomial sequence relation
- Show that if $\{P_n\}$,$ n\geq0$ is orthogonal with respect to a linear functional $L$ then the following two are equivalent.
- Orthogonality and norm of Hermite polynomials
Related Questions in APPROXIMATION-THEORY
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Clarification for definition of admissible: $\Delta\in (K)$
- Best approximation of a function out of a closed subset
- Approximation for the following integral needed
- approximate bijective function such that the inverses are bijective and "easily" computable
- Approximating $\frac{\frac{N}{2}!\frac{N}{2}!}{(\frac{N}{2}-m)!(\frac{N}{2}+m)!}$ without using logs
- Prove that a set is not strictly convex
- Uniform approximation of second derivative via Bernstein polynomial
- Show that there exists 2 different best approximations
- Zolotarev number and commuting matrices
Related Questions in LEGENDRE-POLYNOMIALS
- Why is Legendre's polynomial the solution to the theta equation in the Schrödinger's equation of a hydrogen atom?
- Calculate Stieltjes Polynomial
- How do I turn $\cos(3\theta)$ into a polynomial?
- Legendre polynomials: show that two algorithms construct the same polynomials
- Asymptotic form of the associated Legendre polynomials $P^m_l (z)$ at z=1
- Calculating coefficient of approximation polynomial which is expanded in to a series of Legendre Polynomials
- Proving orthogonality of Legendre polynomials
- If $P_n(1)=1$ calculate $P'_n(1)$ in Legendre polynomials
- Proving a result related to Legendre polynomials
- How to prove that Legendre polynomials satisfy $P_n(x)\leq 1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
One might think that the most efficient answer would be to apply a straightforward change of variables to the Legendre polynomials defined on $(-1, 1)$, but the paper by Crouzeix and Thomée (which was referred to in a comment, now deleted) imposes the atypical requirement $\psi(0) = 0$, which also helps to explain the atypical exponents in the expression $x^{k+1}(1-x)^{k}$; so it seems to be necessary to start from scratch. (Unless, that is, someone can explain what the authors have in mind when they write that the requirements $\psi(0) = 0$, $\psi(1) = 1$, $\int^{1}_{0} \psi(x)q(x)\,dx = 0,~\forall q\in P^{0}_{k}(I)$ "imply easily" the stated formula for $\psi$!)
One has to assume $k > 0$ (or else the problem doesn't make sense); and if $k = 1$, the only solution is $\psi(x) = x$, which agrees with the stated formula; so we can assume from now on that $k \geqslant 2$.
For $k \geqslant 2$, the main condition reduces to $\int^{1}_{0} x(1 - x)\psi(x)p(x)\,dx = 0,~\forall p\in P_{k-2}$, where $P_{k-2}$ is the set of all polynomials of degree $\leqslant k - 2$.
By a standard argument, as in $\S12.3$ of Powell, Approximation Theory and Methods (1981), this condition on its own determines $\psi$ as a multiple of a certain polynomial of degree $k - 1$.
The condition $\psi(1) = 1$ then normalises $\psi$. Finally, the condition $\psi(0) = 0$ imposes an extra factor of $x$, making $\psi$ a polynomial of degree $k$, as expected.
The simplest way to make this last rather fuzzy statement precise is probably to write $\psi(x) = x\varphi_{k-1}(x)$, from the outset, where $\varphi_{k-1}$ is some continuous function on $(0, 1)$, so that the main condition is now: $$ \int^{1}_{0} w(x)\varphi_{k-1}(x)p(x)\,dx = 0,~\forall p\in P_{k-2}, $$ which incorporates a "weight function", $w(x) = x^2(1 - x)$.
Powell's Theorem 12.5 (I'm afraid that at the moment I lack the time to consult other books for the same result) tells us that this is satisfied if we can find a $(k - 1)$-times differentiable function $u$ on $(0, 1)$ such that: \begin{gather*} u^{(k - 1)}(x) = w(x)\varphi_{k-1}(x) \qquad (0 \leqslant x \leqslant 1), \\ u^{(i)}(0) = u^{(i)}(1) = 0 \qquad (i = 0, 1, \ldots k - 2). \end{gather*} The function $u$ is easy to guess, but we don't even need to guess, because it has been stated for us: $$ u(x) = Cx^{k + 1}(1 - x)^k \qquad (0 \leqslant x \leqslant 1), $$ where $C$ is a constant, to be determined by the remaining condition $\varphi_{k-1}(1) = 1$.
Since $u^{(k - 1)}(x)/w(x)$ is a sum of terms which all vanish as $x \to 1$, except for $(-1)^{k - 1}(k!)Cx^{k - 1}$, this condition becomes $C = (-1)^{k - 1}/k!$, and we are done.
[All this has done is to derive the required special result from a standard theorem. Should I also write out a proof of that theorem? It's not long, but it may be redundant.]