The following question came up naturally whilst studying diophantine equations: given an elliptic curve $E$ of the form $Y^2 + aY = X^3 +bX^2 + cX + d$ defined over $\mathbb{Q}$, consider the subset $C \subseteq \mathbb{Q}$ of numbers which appear as either the first or the second coordinate of a rational point on $E$.
If we assume that $E$ has infinitely many points then $C$ is infinite. I would like to understand how 'large' $C$ can get, in particular: can we choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all prime numbers $p$? Maybe we can at least choose $E$ such that $C$ has unbounded $p$-adic value for all primes in a given finite set of prime numbers? I know almost nothing about the topic, so any pointers you might have to articles or books studying the set $C$ would be very helpful.
I'm not sure when you say unbounded $p$-adic value (absolute value?) you mean above or below?
Here is something that might interest you at least. Whenever $E(\mathbf Q)$ is infinite the set $C$ will always contain rationals with arbitrarily large $p$-adic absolute value, so denominator highly divisible by $p$. In fact these all come from the $x$ coordinate alone.
The trick here is the $p$-adic filtration on $E$, we may define for any $p$
$$ E_n = \{P \in E(\mathbf Q_p) : v_p(x(P)) \le -2n \} $$
then this is a descending sequence of subgroups of $E(\mathbf Q_p)$ which we think of as the subgroups of $p$-adic points which are $p$-adically close to the point at infinity. For this sequence the magic is that we have
$$E(\mathbf Q_p)/E_1 \cong E(\mathbf F_p)$$
and
$$E_n/E_{n+1} \cong \mathbf F_p$$
as groups. For detail you can look at Husemoller's book chapter 14. The point is if $P \in E(\mathbf Q)$ is of infinite order then $(\#E(\mathbf F_p)) \cdot P \in E_1$ and moreover $p^n \cdot (\#E(\mathbf F_p)) \cdot P \in E_n$ so we have a point with large negative $p$-adic valuation.
And here is some Sage code demonstrating this because I like Sage code:
You should probably be a little careful with the definition of the filtration if $E$ has bad reduction at $p$ but it should still work (I can show an example of this if you like).