Part of Let $X$ be a simply ordered set with the least upper bound property with respect to the order topology. Then each closed interval is compact.

799 Views Asked by At

From my topology notes...

Let $X$ be a simply ordered set with the least upper bound property with respect to the order topology. Then each closed interval is compact.

Proof. First step toward showing $[a, b]$ is compact: Assuming $a < b$, let $A$ be a covering of $[a, b]$ by open sets in the relative topology. If $x \in [a, b]$ with $x \neq b$, then there should exist a point $y > x$ in $[a, b]$ such that $[x, y]$ can be covered by at most two elements of $A$.

This statement is confusing me. I am guessing the author means the intervals $(a,x], (x,y]$, but why "at most 2". Insights appreciated.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The number $2$ is irrelevant, all that matters is that it's finite.

This can be seen from the remainder of the proof where the set $C$ is defined of all $y > a$ such that $[a,y]$ can be covered by finitely many cover elements.

This first step shows that $C \neq \emptyset$, so $\sup C$ exists and the final steps are $\sup C \in C$ and $\sup C = b$, all of which only use the finitely many property.

4
On

Let $\mathscr C$ be a cover of $[a,b]$. If $x\in [a,b],$ there is an open set $U\in \mathscr C$ which covers $x$. If $x$ has no successor, then there is a $x<y\in U$ and so $x$ and $y$ are both covered by $U$, so that so is $[x,y]$. On the other hand, if $x$ has a successor $y$ , then as $y$ us covered by some $V\in \mathscr C$, the set $[x,y]$ is covered $U\cup V$.

3
On

Assume X is the reals. Cover X with
A = { [a,x), (x,b] : a < x < b }.
More than two sets of A will cover [x,y].

Could he be trying to prove [a,b] compact by using
Alexander's subbase theorem, the easiest method?

A space is compact iff every covering by
subbase sets has a finite subcovering.

A subbase for [a,b] is { [a,x), (x,b] : a < x < b }.
Given a subbase covering, show there is a two set subcover.
Give an example showing this method fails for [a,b] $\cap$ Q.