If $f_1,\ldots,f_n:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ are periodic functions such that $$ \lim\limits_{x\rightarrow +\infty}{(f_1(x)+\ldots+f_n(x))}=0 $$ how can I prove that $f_1+\ldots+f_n=0$ ?
2026-03-29 12:13:01.1774786381
Periodic functions whose sum is null
150 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in PERIODIC-FUNCTIONS
- Is the professor wrong? Simple ODE question
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- To show $\int_{a}^{a+T} f(x)dx$ is independant in $a$
- Is the function $f(t)=\sin(\omega_0 t+\phi_0(t))$ periodic?
- Periodic function notation, need help with a fundamental concept
- Time dependent differential equation system with periodicity
- Let $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ and $\exists \ \ b \in \mathbb{R} : f(x+b)=\sqrt{f(x)-f^2(x)}+\frac{1}{2}$
- Compute the period of this function $f(x)=7+3\cos{(\pi x)}-8\sin{(\pi x)}+4\cos{(2\pi x)}-6\sin{(2\pi x)}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In a previous version (below) we showed it's true if the $f_j$ are continuous. Today it turns out it's true for two arbitrary periodic functions (probably the proof generalizes to finitely many periodic functions; I have to go to class).
Suppose that $f$ has period $1$, $g$ has period $p>0$, and $f+g$ tends to $0$ at $+\infty$.
Indeed, since $f$ has period $1$ and $g$ has period $p$ it follows that $$f(a+p)-f(a)=(f+g)(a+p+n)-(f+g)(a+n)\to0\quad(n\to\infty).$$
Previous Result
I suspect it's true if the $f_j$ are arbitrary periodic functions; I can prove it if they're locally integrable:
Say a trigonometric polynomial is a (possibly non-periodic) linear combination of the functions $e_\omega$ ($\omega\in\Bbb R$), where $e_\omega(t)=e^{i\omega t}$.
This is clear from standard results about "almost periodic functions". Or, it follows easily from
Proof. $\Bbb R$ is a vector space over $\Bbb Q$. Since any spanning set for any subspace contains a basis, we may assume, perhaps after reordering the $\omega_j$, that $\omega_1,\dots,\omega_k$ are $\Bbb Q$--independent and every $\omega_j$ for $j>k$ is a $\Bbb Q$-linear combination of $\omega_1,\dots,\omega_k$.
That famous thing about equidistribution on the torus shows that there exist $t_n\to\infty$ with $$\lim_ne^{i\omega_jt_n}=1\quad(1\le j\le k).$$
Choose an integer $K$ so that if $j>k$ then $K\omega_j$ is a linear combination of $\omega_1,\dots,\omega_k$ with integer coefficients. It follows that $$\lim_ne^{i\omega_jKt_n}=1\quad(1\le j\le n).$$(Because if $K\omega_j=\sum_{l=1}^k\alpha_l\omega_l$ with $\alpha_l\in\Bbb Z$ then $$e^{i\omega_jKt_n}=\prod_{l=1}^k(e^{i\omega_lt_n})^{\alpha_j}.)$$
Proof of Lemma 0. Say $$p(t)=\sum_{j=1}^dc_je^{i\omega_jt}.$$Choose $t_n\to\infty$ as in Lemma 1. Then $$p(t)=\lim_np(t+t_n).$$
Now assume $f_1,\dots,f_n$ are periodic, let $f=f_1+\dots+f_n$, and assume $f(x)\to0$ at $+\infty$.
Assume first that each $f_j$ is continuous. Each $f_j$ is the uniform limit of a sequence of (periodic) trigonometric polynomials, so $f$ is the limit of a sequence of (aperiodic) trigonometric polynomials. So Lemma 0 implies that $$|f(x)|\le\sup_{t>A}|f(t)|,$$so $f(x)=0$.
Finally suppose just that each $f_j$ is a locally integrable periodic function. Say $(\phi_k)\subset C_c(\Bbb R)$ is an approximate identity: $\phi_k\ge0$, $\int\phi_k=1$ and $supp(\phi_k)\to\{0\}$. Now $\phi_k*f_j$ is continuous and periodic, and $$\sum_j\phi_k*f_j(x)=\phi_k*f(x)\to0\quad(x\to\infty),$$so the previous paragraph implies that $\phi_k*f(x)=0$. But $\lim_k\phi_k*f=f$ almost everywhere, hence $f=0$ almost everywhere.