The Peter-Weyl theorem says that the matrix coefficients of the unitary irreps of a compact topological group $G$ form an orthonormal basis for $L^2(G)$. Similarly, spherical harmonics provide an orthonormal basis for $L^2(S^2)$, however the spherical harmonics are a basis for the irreps of $SO(3)$, not $S^2$, which has no Lie group structure (Lie Group Structure on the 2-Sphere: does the following argument hold?). I understand that the two spaces are intimately related since $SO(3)$ acts transitively on $S^2$, but precisely how does spherical harmonic decomposition relate to the Peter-Weyl theorem considering the space under question is not a topological group?
2026-03-25 11:00:04.1774436404
Peter-Weyl Theorem on the Sphere
576 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GROUP-THEORY
- What is the intersection of the vertices of a face of a simplicial complex?
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- How to construct a group whose "size" grows between polynomially and exponentially.
- Conjugacy class formula
- $G$ abelian when $Z(G)$ is a proper subset of $G$?
- A group of order 189 is not simple
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
- subgroups that contain a normal subgroup is also normal
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in HARMONIC-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
- Computing Pontryagin Duals
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Expanding $\left| [\widehat{f}( \xi + h) - \widehat{f}( \xi)]/h - [- 2 \pi i f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) \right|$ into one integral
- When does $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(x+\frac{1}{n})=f(x)$ a.e. fail
- The linear partial differential operator with constant coefficient has no solution
- Show $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}$ is isomorphic to $S^1$
Related Questions in SPHERICAL-HARMONICS
- Finding the kernel of a linear map gotten from a linear map with one kind of bessel function $j_i$ and replacing them with the $y_j$
- Reparametrization of the spherical harmonics so they will be complete in a different region.
- Does it make sense to talk about "frequency" when expanding a function using spherical harmonics?
- derivative of a square-integrable function on the sphere
- Integral of the product of spherical harmonics and derivatives of spherical harmonics
- Spherical Harmonic Identity
- Spherical Harmonic Derivative
- Integral of product of three spherical harmonics with derivatives
- Are the dot products of all vector spherical harmonics complete?
- Calculating a normal vector field for a surface defined by spherical harmonics
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Sorry for answering this old post. Since I also encountered this issue recently and no one has answered it yet, let me briefly summarize what I understand here.
You are right that Peter-Weyl theorem is only a statement for compact topological groups, in this case $SO(3)$. You are also right that $S^2$ is a homogeneous space for $SO(3)$, more precisely, $S^2 \cong SO(3) \big/ SO(2)$. Using these two facts we can establish a "Peter-Weyl theorem" on homogeneous spaces. In the following, let's use a more general notation, denoting $SO(3)$ by $G$, and $SO(2)$ by $H$.
Peter-Weyl theorem states that as a representation of $G \times G$, $L^2(G)$ can be decomposed into $$L^2(G) \cong \bigoplus_{\lambda\in\hat G} V_\lambda \otimes V_\lambda^*,$$ where $\hat G$ denotes the set of irreducible representations (irreps) of $G$. Furthermore, for $(g_1,g_2) \in G \times G$ and $f \in L^2(G)$, $(g_1,g_2)$ acts on $f$ as $$(g_1,g_2)\cdot f(g) = f(g_1^{-1}g g_2).$$ This implies that $L^2(G)$ can also be thought of as a representation of $G$, with $g_1 \in G$ acting on $f$ as $(g_1, e)$, where $e$ is the identity of $G$. This is known as the (left) regular representation of $G$. Thinking in this way, we see that each irrep $\lambda$ of $G$ appears with multiplicity $\dim(V_\lambda^*)$.
Now let's consider $L^2(G\big/H)$, where $G\big/H$ is the set of left cosets $\{gH| g\in G\}$. Then $L^2(G\big/H) = \{f \in L^2(G) | f(gh) = f(g), \forall g \in G \text{ and } h \in H\}$. Clearly $L^2(G\big/H)$ still forms a representation of $G$ on the left: for $g_1 \in G$, $f \in L^2(G\big/H)$, $g_1\cdot f(g) = f(g_1^{-1} g)$, and it can also be easily checked that $L^2(G\big/H)$ is closed under such action. However, $L^2(G\big/H)$ is a trivial representation of $H$ on the right. Therefore as a representation of $G$, $L^2(G\big/H)$ can be decomposed into $$L^2(G\big/H) \cong \bigoplus_{\lambda\in\hat G} V_\lambda \otimes W_\lambda^*,$$ where $W_\lambda \subset V_\lambda$ is a trivial representation of $H$.
Finally, recall that irreps of $SO(3)$ can be labeled by spin $j$, and therefore $$L^2(SO(3)) \cong \bigoplus_{j=0,\frac{1}{2},\cdots} V_j \otimes V_j^*,$$ where $V_j$ is an irrep of $SO(3)$ with spin $j$. $W_j \in V_j$ is a trivial representation of $SO(2)$ means that $W_j$ is spanned by the eigenvectors of $SO(2)$ with eigenvalue zero. Since we know $V_j$ has precisely one such eigenvector if and only if $j$ is an integer, therefore $$L^2(S^2) \cong \bigoplus_{j=0,1,\cdots} V_j,$$ where $V_j$ corresponds to the spherical harmonics.