Most of the problems I've seen involving the pigeonhole principle have so far seemed fairly artificial. As I'm studying CompSci I'm interested what kind of practical, real world problems in CompSci are solved using this principle?
2026-04-02 16:30:34.1775147434
Pigeonhole: Practical Applications in Computer Science
6.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMBINATORICS
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- The function $f(x)=$ ${b^mx^m}\over(1-bx)^{m+1}$ is a generating function of the sequence $\{a_n\}$. Find the coefficient of $x^n$
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Hard combinatorial identity: $\sum_{l=0}^p(-1)^l\binom{2l}{l}\binom{k}{p-l}\binom{2k+2l-2p}{k+l-p}^{-1}=4^p\binom{k-1}{p}\binom{2k}{k}^{-1}$
- Algebraic step including finite sum and binomial coefficient
- nth letter of lexicographically ordered substrings
- Count of possible money splits
- Covering vector space over finite field by subspaces
- A certain partition of 28
- Counting argument proof or inductive proof of $F_1 {n \choose1}+...+F_n {n \choose n} = F_{2n}$ where $F_i$ are Fibonacci
Related Questions in SOFT-QUESTION
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Online resources for networking and creating new mathematical collaborations
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Could anyone give an **example** that a problem that can be solved by creating a new group?
- How do you prevent being lead astray when you're working on a problem that takes months/years?
- Is it impossible to grasp Multivariable Calculus with poor prerequisite from Single variable calculus?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
Related Questions in PIGEONHOLE-PRINCIPLE
- Is it possible to make a computer network of 75 computers
- Pigeonhole principle: prove that a class of 21 has at least 11 male or 11 female students.
- Proving that a set of 2016 natural numbers contain a non-empty set with a sum divisible by 2016
- Question on proof of Erdos and Szekeres
- Pigeon Hole Principle Proof integrated with sets
- # of vertices and # of connected components proof problem?
- Prove that any collection of 8 distinct integers contains distinct x and y such that x - y is divisible by 7.
- Hint for problem on $4 \times 7$-chessboard problem related to pigeonhole principle
- Pigeonhole principle subsets
- $80$ balls in a row. $50$ of them are yellow and $30$ are blue. Prove that there are at least $2$ blue balls with a distance of exactly $3$ or $6$.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Some problems can be shown not to be solvable using the pigeonhole principle. For example, the nonexistence of a universal lossless compression algorithm (an algorithm that always compresses a string of characters into a shorter string of characters) can be shown to be impossible by using a pigeonhole argument that shows that two strings would have to be compressed into the same compressed representation, making it impossible to losslessly decompress the string. The pigeonhole principle is also the basis for the pumping lemma for regular and context-free languages, which can be used to show that certain languages are not regular or context-free. These proofs are a bit more involved, but can be used to show that programming languages can't be parsed purely by regular expressions and context-free grammars.
The pigeonhole principle can be used in a more subtle way to derive the $\Omega(n \log n)$ lower bound on comparison sorts by showing that if the algorithm makes fewer comparisons than this, there must be some pair of inputs that the algorithm wouldn't be able to distinguish, since there are more possible inputs than configurations of the algorithm. Similar arguments can be used to show other lower bounds in other problems.
Also in CS theory, the proof that the word problem for linear bounded automata (that is, given an LBA and a string, does the LBA accept the string?) can be shown to be decidable using the pigeonhole principle. You just watch the automata for some number of steps, and if it ever enters a duplicate configuration, it must loop forever. Since there are only finitely many configurations of the LBA when run on a given input string w (say there are n possible configurations) this process is guaranteed to terminate in at most n + 1 steps, since after n + 1 the machine must either have halted or visited some state twice and is looping infinitely.
Hope this helps!