Problem on Do Carmo's definition of manifold

273 Views Asked by At

In the book Riemannian Geometry, Do Carmo gave his definition of manifold without metionning to the topology on the set M. However, the usual way to define manifold is always to supposing M is a topological space with some restrictions on the topology, such as $A_{2}$ or $T_{2}$. enter image description here

Later, he made a remark on this. As he said, we can induce a natural topology on M using the differential structure. enter image description here

My question is that:

What happened if the topology induced in this way may not be $T_{2}$ or $A_{2}$? Do Carmo metioned this problem but he didn't give an answer. I am in a mess now...Help, thanks in advance. enter image description here