I am trying to understand how to do proof by induction for inequalities. The step that I don't fully understand is making an assumption that n=k+1. For equations it is simple. For example:
Prove that 1+2+3+...+n = $ \frac {n(n+1)}{2} $ is valid for $ i \ge 1 $
1) Base case for n=1. (...)
2) Assume that equation is true for n=k. (...)
3) Proof for n=k+1.
1+2+3+...+k+(k+1) = $ \frac {(k+1)[(k+1)+1]}{2} $
So we add +1 to k on both sides.
For inequalities:
Prove that $ 4n \lt 2^n $ is valid for $ n \ge 5 $
1) Base case. (...)
2) n=k assumption. (...)
3) n=k+1 proof.
How I would do this(add 1 to k on both sides):
$ 4(k+1) < 2^{k+1} $
How it's done in tutorials:
$ 4(k+1) < 2^k + 4 $
$ 4k+4 < 2^k + 4 $
Why they add extra 4 to RHS instead of increasing k by 1?
I think you've got the logic wrong with respect to proof by induction. Let's say we are trying to prove a proposition $P(n)$, which might be, for example, $$P(n): \;1 + 2 + 3 +\cdots + n = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}, \;n\geq 1$$
Base CaseProve that $P(1)$ is true. That is, we test whether the proposition holds for smallest applicable value of $n$, which in this case is $n = 1.$ This certainly holds, since $1 = \frac{1\cdot 2}{2}$.
Inductive hypothesis (IH): We assume $P(k)$ holds, i.e. that the proposition holds for $n = k$. So we assume $$P(k):\;1 + 2 + \cdots + k = \dfrac{k(k+1)}{2}$$
Inductive Step: Now, given that we have assumed that $P(k)$ is true, we need to prove that $P(k)$ implies $P(k+1)$. $P(k+1)$ is not an assumption. We need to prove that it follows from the Inductive Hypothesis (IH). So what we want to prove is that $$1 + 2 + \cdots + k + (k+1) = \dfrac{(k+1)((k+1) + 1)}2 = \dfrac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}$$We can prove this by starting with what we know and what we have already assumed.$$\color{blue}{1 + 2 + \cdots + k} + (k+1) \overset{IH} = \color{blue}{\frac{k(k+1)}2} + k+1$$ Now, with a little algebra, we can express the right-hand side in the desired form.
Now, for the inequality:
Your base case is $n = 5$. Why?
The inductive hypothesis that we assume for $n = k$ is $4k \lt 2^k$.
Now, assuming $4k\lt 2^k$, we need to prove that $4(k+1) \lt 2^{k+1}$. We can start from the left hand side and sue the inductive hypothest:
$$4(k + 1) = \color{blue}{4k} + 4 \lt \color{blue}{2^k} + 4 = 2^k + 2^2 \leq 2\cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}$$ as desired. The last step on the right holds for $k\geq 2$, which is fine, since we are proving the proposition for $n \geq 5$.