I don't understand the step: $[g(1)]_\alpha=[g]_\alpha^\gamma$ in the proof below. Is there any other way to prove it?
$\dagger$ The theorem 2.11 it uses is $[\mathsf{T}f]_\alpha^\gamma=[\mathsf{T}]_\beta^\gamma[f]^\beta_\alpha.$
I don't understand the step: $[g(1)]_\alpha=[g]_\alpha^\gamma$ in the proof below. Is there any other way to prove it?
$\dagger$ The theorem 2.11 it uses is $[\mathsf{T}f]_\alpha^\gamma=[\mathsf{T}]_\beta^\gamma[f]^\beta_\alpha.$
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.

$\alpha=\{1\}$ is the basis for $F$ and $g:F\to W$. So the matrix of $g(1)$ with respect to $\gamma$ is the matrix of $g$ with respect to $\gamma$ and $\alpha=\{1\}$.