I haven't seen any similar combinatorial identities of this form in textbooks. I had the left hand side in the first place and the right hand side was given by Mathematica. I'm not sure how Mathematica was able to solve it but I do expect that this has a simple combinatorial proof. I tried to look for one but I was stuck.
Any help?
PS: I am a high school student self-studying combinatorics, so combinatorial proofs or generating-function-based proofs are the best for me. If things like hypergeometric functions or gamma functions cannot be avoided I am glad to accept them as well:) Just means that I need to go deeper. At least it's not some Mathematica magic:)
We prose to solve this sum by making use of two results $$\sum_{p=m}^{2m} 2^{-p} {p \choose m}=1~~~~(1)$$ see How to prove that $\sum_{i=0}^n 2^i\binom{2n-i}{n} = 4^n$.
and
see Help in summing: $\sum_{k=m} ^{2m} ~k\cdot ~2^{-k} {k \choose m}$ $$\sum_{p=m}^{2m} p ~2^{-p} {p \choose m}=(2m+1)-2^{-2m-1}(m+1) {2m+2 \choose m+1}~~~~(2)$$
$$S=\sum_{k=1}^{n} k 2 ^k {2n-k-1\choose n-1}= 2^{2m+1} \sum_{p=m}^{2m}[2m+1-p]~2^{-p}~ {p \choose m},~ m=n-1, p=2n-k-1.~~~~~(3)$$ Next by using ((1) and (2) in (3) we get $$S=(m+1) {2m+2 \choose m+1}=n {2n \choose n}.$$