One can infer the completeness of $L^p$ by using the homeomorphism $\varphi: L^p \to L^1$ defined by $f \mapsto |f|^{p-1} f$. This rests on the inequality: $$ 2^{1-p} || f- g||_p^p \leq ||\varphi(f) -\varphi(g)||_1\leq p (||f||_p + ||g||_p)^{p-1} ||f-g ||_p$$ Which I am not sure how to prove, does anyone know where this inequality comes from or have any hints on how to show this? Thanks.
2026-03-25 04:43:32.1774413812
Proof of Riesz-Fischer Theorem using the completeness of $L^1$ to infer completeness of $L^p$.
114 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-MEASURE
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
- Is $L^p(\Omega)$ separable over Lebesgue measure.
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- uncountable families of measurable sets, in particular balls
- Joint CDF of $X, Y$ dependent on $X$
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- True or False Question on Outer measure.
- Which of the following is an outer measure?
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
Related Questions in BANACH-SPACES
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Is ${C}[0,1],\Bbb{R}$ homeomorphic to any $\Bbb{R^n}$, for an integer $n$?
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
- Theorem 1.7.9 of Megginson: Completeness is a three-space property.
- A weakly open subset of the unit ball of the Read's space $R$ (an infinite-dimensional Banach space) is unbounded.
- Separability of differentiable functions
- Showing $u_{\lambda}(x):= \left(\frac{\lambda}{{\lambda}^{2}+|x|^2}\right)^{\frac{n-2}{2}}$ is not sequentially compact in $L^{2^{*}}$
- Proving that a composition of bounded operator and trace class operator is trace class
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For the first inequality:
First we prove that $u^{p}-1-2^{1-p}(u-1)^{p}\geq 0$ for $u\geq 1$.
Let $\phi(u)=u^{p}-1-2^{1-p}(u-1)^{p}$. For $u>1$, then $\phi(u)=\phi(u)-\phi(1)=p(\xi^{p-1}-2^{1-p}(\xi-1)^{p-1})$, where $\xi\in(1,u)$. Note that \begin{align*} \xi^{p-1}&> 2^{1-p}(\xi-1)^{p-1}\\ \xi&> 2^{-1}(\xi-1)\\ 2\xi&>\xi-1\\ \xi&>-1 \end{align*} each step is valid if and only if, so $\xi^{p-1}-2^{1-p}(\xi-1)^{p-1}>0$ and hence $\phi(u)>0$ for $u>1$, and hence $\phi(u)\geq 0$ for $u\geq 1$.
Now let $a\geq b>0$, then $a/b\geq 1$ and hence \begin{align*} 2^{1-p}\left(\dfrac{a}{b}-1\right)^{p}\leq\left(\dfrac{a}{b}\right)^{p}-1, \end{align*} so \begin{align*} 2^{1-p}(a-b)^{p}\leq a^{p}-b^{p}, \end{align*} this inequality also holds for $b=0$, so we conclude that $2^{1-p}(a-b)^{p}\leq a^{p}-b^{p}$ for $a\geq b\geq 0$.
Assume now that $a\geq 0\geq b$, by Jensen's inequality, \begin{align*} \left(\dfrac{a+(-b)}{2}\right)^{p}\leq\dfrac{1}{2}a^{p}+\dfrac{1}{2}(-b)^{p}, \end{align*} we conclude that \begin{align*} 2^{1-p}(a-b)^{p}\leq a^{p}+(-b)^{p}=\bigg|a|a|^{p-1}-b|b|^{p-1}\bigg|. \end{align*} We conclude the general inequality that \begin{align*} 2^{1-p}|f-g|^{p}\leq\bigg|f|f|^{p-1}-g|g|^{p-1}\bigg|, \end{align*} taking integrals both sides, we have \begin{align*} 2^{1-p}\|f-g\|_{p}^{p}&=2^{1-p}\int|f-g|^{p}\\ &\leq\int\bigg|f|f|^{p-1}-g|g|^{p-1}\bigg|\\ &=\|\varphi(f)-\varphi(g)\|_{1}. \end{align*}
For the second inequality:
For $a,b\geq 0$, then $|a^{p}-b^{p}|=p|a-b|\xi^{p-1}\leq p|a-b|(a+b)^{p-1}$ for some $\xi$ lies in between $a,b$, this is by Mean Value Theorem.
Assume first that $f,g\geq 0$, then \begin{align*} |f^{p}-g^{p}|\leq p|f-g|(f+g)^{p-1}, \end{align*} then by Holder's inequality, we have \begin{align*} \int|f^{p}-g^{p}|&\leq p\left(\int|f-g|^{p}\right)^{1/p}\left(\int((f+g)^{p-1})^{p/(p-1)}\right)^{(p-1)/p}\\ &=p\|f-g\|_{p}\|f+g\|_{p}^{p-1}\\ &\leq p\|f-g\|_{p}(\|f\|_{p}+\|g\|_{p})^{p-1}, \end{align*} where the last inequality is by Minkowski's inequality.
Now consider the general $f,g$. If $x$ is such that $f(x),g(x)\geq 0$, then \begin{align*} ||f(x)|^{p-1}f(x)-|g(x)|^{p-1}g(x)|&=|f(x)^{p}-g(x)^{p}|\leq p|f(x)-g(x)|(|f(x)|+|g(x)|)^{p-1}, \end{align*} if $x$ is such that $f(x)\geq 0\geq g(x)$, then \begin{align*} ||f(x)|^{p-1}f(x)-|g(x)|^{p-1}g(x)|&=f(x)^{p}+(-g(x))^{p}\\ &\leq(f(x)-g(x))^{p}\\ &\leq p(f(x)-g(x))(f(x)-g(x))^{p-1}\\ &=p|f(x)-g(x)|(|f(x)|+|g(x)|)^{p-1}, \end{align*} so in either case, we have the inequality that \begin{align*} ||f|^{p-1}f-|g|^{p-1}g|\leq p|f-g|(|f|+|g|)^{p-1}, \end{align*} the rest reasoning is similar to the first one by taking Holder's inequality and then Minkowski's inequality.