I wish to prove the following theorem.
Statement: If $$\lim_{x\to \ a} f(x)=b\neq0,$$ then the function $$\frac{1}{f(x)}$$ is bounded for $x\rightarrow a.$
Attempt
From the definition of a limit, $$\| f(x)-b \|<\varepsilon.$$
Taking the absolute value from both sides, remembering that $\epsilon>0$ yields $$\|f(x)-b\|<\varepsilon.$$
Since in general $|w-z|\ge |w|-|z|$, then$$\|f(x)-b\|\ge ||f(x)| - |b||$$ and consequently $$||f(x)|-|b||<\varepsilon\iff-\varepsilon<|f(x)|-|b|<\varepsilon.$$
Add $|b|$ to the inequality.
$$|b|-\varepsilon<|f(x)|<\varepsilon+|b|$$ This is where I get stuck, however my book on analysis does not. According to the text, this result implies
$$\frac{1}{|b|-\varepsilon} \operatorname*{>}^\text{?} \frac{1}{|f(x)|} > \frac{1}{\varepsilon+|b|}.$$
Question
The part with the question mark is the one I am having trouble with. More specifically, how can one be sure that $$|b|-\varepsilon>0\ \text{ or } \ |b| > \varepsilon\text{?}$$
I am even more confused because
$$\|f(x)-b\| \ge ||f(x)|-|b|| > |-|b||=|b|$$
to me shows the opposite, i.e., $$|b|<\varepsilon.$$
What am I missing?
Remember the limit definition - it states that $|f(x) - b| <\varepsilon$ for all $\varepsilon > 0$. Because $b \neq 0$ you can choose an $\varepsilon$ such that $|b|>\varepsilon > 0$.
Also the statement $||f(x)| - b| > |-|b||$ is wrong - take $f(x) = 2$, $b = 3$ for example.