I am trying to prove that the invertible elements of $\mathbb{Z}_n$ are closed under multiplication. Taking the definition for granted (though I am not sure how to "prove" something like this; I assume it is something that is typically taken as a definition), $$\overline{a} \cdot \overline{b} = \overline{ab},$$ it appears true by definition that $\overline{ab}$ is an element of $\mathbb{Z}_n$: $a, b \in \mathbb{Z}$, so $ab \in \mathbb{Z}$, and the "vertical bar" (notation I am not particularly accustomed to) forces this to be an element of $\mathbb{Z}_n$, even if $ab \in \{0, 1, \ldots, n-1\}$, as it is surely equivalent to one even if not. It suffices to show that this element is invertible. Since $\overline{a}$ and $\overline{b}$ are invertible (call the inverses $\overline{c}$ and $\overline{d}$, respectively) I claim that $\overline{dc}$ is the inverse of $\overline{ab}$. Using only the properties of $\mathbb{Z}$, we get: $$\overline{ab} \cdot \overline{dc} = \overline{(ab)(dc)} = \overline{(ac)(bd)} = \overline{ac} \cdot \overline{bd} = \overline{1} \cdot \overline{1} = \overline{1}.$$ How does this look? Have I skipped any steps?
2026-04-23 15:02:51.1776956571
Proof that units mod $n$ are closed
214 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MODULAR-ARITHMETIC
- How do I find the least x that satisfies this congruence properties?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- Remainder of $22!$ upon division with $23$?
- Does increasing the modulo decrease collisions?
- Congruence equation ...
- Reducing products in modular arithmetic
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Lack of clarity over modular arithmetic notation
- How to prove infinitely many integer triples $x,y,z$ such that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2$ is divisible by $(x + y +z)$
- Can $\mathbb{Z}_2$ be constructed as the closure of $4\mathbb{Z}+1$?
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you know some abstract algebra, this can be proved in a more general sense. Note that $\mathbb{Z}_n$ is an example of a ring with identity. Let $R$ be an arbitrary ring with identity, and let $R^\times$ be the set of units in $R$. We will show $R^\times$ is closed under multiplication. Let $a,b\in R^\times$. Then $a,b$ are units in $R$, so there exist elements $c,d\in R$ such that $ac=bd=1$. We need to show $ab\in R^\times$, that is, $ab$ is a unit in $R$. Observe $$ (ab)(dc)=a(bd)c=ac=1. $$ Therefore $ab$ has an inverse in $R$, namely $dc$. Hence $ab\in R^\times$, so the set of units of $R$ is closed under multiplication. It is useful to note that we never assumed commutativity here. Indeed, this result holds for arbitrary rings with identity.