Prove that $(E \land G) \lor ( G \rightarrow F )$ is formally deducible from $(E \lor F)$
where:
- "$\land$" means AND
- "$\lor$" means OR
- "$\rightarrow$" denotes an implication
This is what I have so far:
$E \lor F \vdash E \lor F$
$E \lor F , E, F, G \vdash F$
$E \lor F , E, F \vdash (G\rightarrow F)$
But I have no idea how I would get $E \land G$ since neither of them are given by the premise.
Law of Complements: either $G$ or not $G$.
$E\vee F \vdash (E\wedge\neg F) \vee F$
$(E\wedge\neg F)\;\wedge\; (G\vee\neg G)\;\vdash\; (E\wedge \neg F\wedge G) \;\vee\; (E\wedge \neg F\wedge \neg G)$
Now $(E\wedge \neg F\wedge G)\vdash E\wedge G$ and $(E\wedge\neg F\wedge \neg G)\vdash \neg G$ and $F\vdash G\to F$
So $(E\vee F)\;\vdash\; (E\wedge G)\;\vee\; (G\to F)$