I tried doing this by defining a function $f$ which takes an element (a subset of $\mathbb{N}$) and maps it to an infinite sequence of $0$s & $1$s. A subset, i.e the element of $P(\mathbb{N})$ will contain discrete numbers from $\mathbb{N}$ (arranged in increasing order, since the order of numbers in a subset does not change the element), The same positions as those numbers will get $1$ (become activated) and others would be $0$ (switched off). E.g: $(2,4,6,8,10,\ldots)$ will map to $(0101010101010\ldots)$, $(1,3,5,7,9)$ will map to $(10101010101\ldots)$ , $\mathbb{N}$ itself will map to $(11111111111111111\ldots)$ and null set will map to $(00000000\ldots)$. Is the approach correct? Someone asked me what if I give you an infinite sequence of natural numbers $(a,b,c,d,\ldots)$ i.e an element of $P(\mathbb{N})$, what will be its image? What should be an ideal answer.In other words how to rigorously show that $f$ is well-defined (one-one and onto)?
2026-04-06 16:37:53.1775493473
Prove Cardinality of Power set of $\mathbb{N}$, i.e $P(\mathbb{N})$ and set of infinite sequences of $0$s & $1$s is equal.
2.8k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in SEQUENCES-AND-SERIES
- How to show that $k < m_1+2$?
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Negative Countdown
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- studying the convergence of a series:
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-SET-THEORY
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Composition of functions - properties
- Existence of a denumerble partition.
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- Show that $\omega^2+1$ is a prime number.
- A Convention of Set Builder Notation
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- Problem with Cartesian product and dimension for beginners
- Proof that a pair is injective and surjective
- Value of infinite product
Related Questions in FUNCTIONS
- Functions - confusion regarding properties, as per example in wiki
- Composition of functions - properties
- Finding Range from Domain
- Why is surjectivity defined using $\exists$ rather than $\exists !$
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Lower bound of bounded functions.
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Given a function, prove that it's injective
- Surjective function proof
- How to find image of a function
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your approach is essentially correct, but it is not very precise because you are identifying subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ with their increasing enumerations. Although one could say that these two things are "essentially the same," one could also say that subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ are "essentially the same" as infinite sequences of zeroes and ones, but the challenge remains to make these relationships mathematically precise.
First we need a precise notion of "infinite sequence of zeroes and ones." The set of such sequences can be written as $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ and we can think of its elements as functions from $\mathbb{N}$ to the set of digits $\{0,1\}$. The $n$-th element of the sequence is just its value at the argument $n$.
Given a subset $A \subset \mathbb{N}$, we can define a corresponding element $f(A)$ of $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$. Because $f(A)$ is supposed to be a function on $\mathbb{N}$, the way to define it is to specify its value $f(A)(n)$ at each number $n \in \mathbb{N}$. We can do this by writing $$ f(A)(n) = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if } n \notin A\\ 1 & \text{if } n \in A. \end{cases} $$
This is just a precise way of expressing what you said, namely that we put a $1$ in the positions corresponding to numbers that are in $A$ and a $0$ in the positions corresponding to numbers that are not in $A$. Now that we have defined the function $f$, you may be able to show that it is a bijection from $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$ to $\{0,1\}^\mathbb{N}$ (if you get stuck on this, please feel free to leave a comment.)