Let $(M,g)$ be a Riemannian manifold with Levi-Civita connection $\nabla$ and adjoint $\nabla^*$, and exterior derivative $\text{d}^\nabla$ and adjoint $\delta^\nabla$. For a symmetric 2-covariant tensor $h\in\Gamma(S^2M)\subset\Gamma(T^*M\otimes T^*M)\cong\Omega^1(T^*M)$, viewed as a $T^*M$-valued 1-form on $M$, section 12.69. in Besse Einstein Manifolds says that the following is an easy calculation: $$ (\delta^\nabla\text{d}^\nabla+\text{d}^\nabla\delta^\nabla)h=\nabla^*\nabla h-\mathring{R}_gh+h\circ\text{Ricc}_g. $$ Can someone please present a proof or point to where (a detailed) one is available in the literature?
2026-03-25 21:54:05.1774475645
Prove: $(\delta^\nabla\text{d}^\nabla+\text{d}^\nabla\delta^\nabla)h=\nabla^*\nabla h-\mathring{R}_gh+h\circ\text{Ricc}_g$
703 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in GENERAL-RELATIVITY
- How do I use Maple to calculate the Christoffel Symbols of a Metric?
- Do pp-wave spacetimes have a well-defined signature/index?
- Understanding the tensor notation in special/general theory of relativity
- Difference between $T^{i}_{\;\;j}$ and $T_i^{\;\;j}$?
- How can one write a line element for non-integer dimensions?
- Complex coordinates in curved space
- Riemannian Geometry, GR, importance summary?
- Demonstration of relation between geodesics and FLRW metric
- Product between two timelike vectors in any given metric
- Curvature tensor in terms of the metric tensor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Set $\Delta=\text{d}^\nabla\delta^\nabla+\delta^\nabla\text{d}^\nabla$. From (1.34) on page 13 of Ells & Lemaire: If $h\in\Omega^1(V)\cong\Gamma(T^*M\otimes V)$ and $X\in\mathfrak{X}(M)$, then $$ \Delta h_k=\nabla^*\nabla h-g^{ij}R^V(\partial_i,\partial_k)h(\partial_j)+g^{ij}h(R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\partial_j), $$ where $R^V$ is the curvature tensor the vector bundle $V\rightarrow M$.
Let $R=R^{T^*M}$ be curvature tensor on $V=T^*M$, where now $h\in\Omega^1(V)\cong\Gamma(T^*M\otimes T^*M)$ is a $T^*M$-valued 1-form, and write \begin{align*} h_k=h(\partial_k)=h(\partial_k,\cdot)&=h_{km}\text{d}x^m. \end{align*} Continue to use geodesic normal coordinates and recall that $R(\partial_i,\partial_j)\partial_k=g^{n\ell}R_{ijk\ell}\partial_n$ to find that: \begin{align*} \Delta h_k&=-g^{ij}\nabla_i\nabla_j h(\partial_k,\cdot)-g^{ij}R(\partial_i,\partial_k)h(\partial_j,\cdot)+g^{ij}h\big(R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\partial_j,\cdot\big)\\ &=-g^{ij}\nabla_i\nabla_jh_{kq}\text{d}x^q-g^{ij}h_{jq}R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\text{d}x^q+g^{ij}g^{sp}h_{pq}R_{ikjs}\text{d}x^q. \end{align*} Now evaluate at $\partial_\ell$ and use the fact that $R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\text{d}x^q(\partial_\ell)=-\text{d}x^q\big(R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\partial_\ell\big)$ to find that: \begin{align*} \Delta h_k(\partial_\ell)&=-g^{ij}\nabla_i\nabla_jh_{kq}\text{d}x^q(\partial_\ell)-g^{ij}h_{jq}R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\text{d}x^q(\partial_\ell)+g^{ij}g^{sp}h_{pq}R_{ikjs}\text{d}x^q(\partial_\ell)\\ &=-g^{ij}\nabla_i\nabla_jh_{k\ell}+g^{ij}h_{jq}\text{d}x^q\big(R(\partial_i,\partial_k)\partial_\ell\big)+g^{ij}g^{sp}h_{p\ell}R_{ikjs}\\ &=\nabla^*\nabla h_{k\ell}-g^{ij}g^{qp}R_{ki\ell p}h_{jq}+g^{sp}h_{p\ell}R_{ks}\\ &=\nabla^*\nabla h_{k\ell}-\mathring{R}_gh_{k\ell}+(h\circ\text{Ricc}_g)_{k\ell} \end{align*} as required.